modelportfolio2003
Newbie
They are going to struggle to compete with Android.
Nokia are trying to create world class services (like Maps, Email, Calendering and Contacts) from scratch with Ovi.
In Google, Android already has a full suite of free services that are market leaders in many areas and have years of experience running huge data centres required for 24/7 99.999% availability.
Nokia have a stable and well understood platform in Symbian, that currently has a poor touch screen user interface and is hard to develop for (although they are attempting to address that with Qt). The problem they have is that the UI needs radical changes - they almost need to scrap what they have and start again from scratch... any radical changes however will render their back catalogue of apps incompatible.
Android has a stable and well understood platform, that has an up to date touch UI and is easy to develop for using standard tools like Java/Eclipse.
Android is being used by the world's leading handset makers, with the exception of Nokia and Apple. There are now multiple handset releases each month, with different form factors, levels of specification and price points.
Symbian is being used by Nokia with a few token handsets from Samsung and Sony Ericsson. There are new handset releases every few months with different forms factors, levels of specification and price points.
@celios
Agree your software comments and that Nokia will struggle to compete. I see Nokia attempting to lower its R & D/Bill of Materials through greater outsourcing to the Taiwanese ODMs. If they can cut BOM costs, they will have more money to reinvest in software/apps while attempting to improve margins. These component makers will become increasingly involved in the design process in areas such as microphones, vibrators, QWERTY keyboards, lenses, helping N reduce module costs. More ODM outsourcing possibly combined with asset light strategy--ie, factory disposals.
Actions will speak louder than words.




