-
After 15+ years, we've made a big change: Android Forums is now Early Bird Club. Learn more here.
MMA Fight: Vampire vs. Zombie who would win?
- Thread starter 041112
- Start date
AntimonyER
CHANGED FROM AF ADDICT MIKESTONY
One on One? That isn't even close, vampire would annihilate the zombie. The zombie's strength is in pure overwhelming numbers. Alone they are quite easy to kill.
netlinkz
Well-Known Member
lmao...comedicLet's even the odds then: zombie from 28 Days Later vs Edward from Twilight
041112
Newbie
I am not so sure about that. Vampire would have nothing to kill. Zombie is undead/already dead. I kind of think the Zombie would keep on coming like the Energizer bunny ... take a licking and keep on ticking like a Timex.
A Zombie does not care about a broken arm, leg, etcetera ... no pain.
I think the Zombie might wear the Vampire down or, at least, keep fighting until daylight shines through into the arena.
Tortoise vs. hare?
argedion
The TechnoFrog
Let's even the odds then: zombie from 28 Days Later vs Edward from Twilight
Vampires don't glitter. But atleast it would be the last of this imposture
argedion
The TechnoFrog
OfTheDamned
The Friendly Undead
Personally, I find this whole thread rather insulting.
There were no zombies in 28 days later and Edward isn't a real vampire.
Vampires:
Vampires don't just kill by drinking blood.
Vampires are not susceptible to human diseases.
Vampires must be decapitated or burned to be killed.
Vampires are capable of actual thought.
Vampires have heightened strength.
Zombies:
Zombies kill humans by infection and/or blood loss.
A zombie can by killed by blunt force trauma to the brain.
Zombies are mindless.
Vampire and zombie enter a ring. Vampire punches through zombies head and zombie is done.
Vampire wins match.
Game over. :joyman:
Let's even the odds then: zombie from 28 Days Later vs Edward from Twilight
There were no zombies in 28 days later and Edward isn't a real vampire.
Vampires:
Vampires don't just kill by drinking blood.
Vampires are not susceptible to human diseases.
Vampires must be decapitated or burned to be killed.
Vampires are capable of actual thought.
Vampires have heightened strength.
Zombies:
Zombies kill humans by infection and/or blood loss.
A zombie can by killed by blunt force trauma to the brain.
Zombies are mindless.
Vampire and zombie enter a ring. Vampire punches through zombies head and zombie is done.
Vampire wins match.
Game over. :joyman:
AntimonyER
CHANGED FROM AF ADDICT MIKESTONY
^^^see?
To be fair OTD educated the GNex pre-release crowd in the details of a zombie vs. Vampire encounter, so that's why I knew the answer
To be fair OTD educated the GNex pre-release crowd in the details of a zombie vs. Vampire encounter, so that's why I knew the answer
041112
Newbie
As has been ingrained in humanity for, maybe, the last 100 years, there are definitely a number of means by which a vampire can be stopped. Means, if you will, to make a vampire really dead or deader. So, the majority of people, I believe, would equate stopping a vampire by staking a vampire through the "heart" or exposing a vampire to sunlight or, possibly, garlic with killing a vampire.
Not always.
The horrifying thing about zombies is that there has never been a clear, definitive, consistent, means demonstrated to stop/"kill" them; there really has not. You might see one fellow succeed at stopping a zombie, say, in a particular movie, by doing such and such while his neighbor down the street, the guy he plays golf with every morning, tries the exact same method only to get himself and his entire family eaten or turned into zombies.
Then you might be watching a group of teenagers try to stop a gang of zombies and you could swear to yourself that what you saw the teenagers do has worked, to stop zombies, before, but now it does not work for the teenagers and they get eaten, etcetera. Almost like rooting an Android phone. You say to yourelf, "self, I know my buddy, so and so, rooted her phone like this"; I did the exact same thing and my phone is now a "brick".
Everyone that knows you have no idea where they live sighs in relief.
argedion
The TechnoFrog
First of a vampire has no heart beat stabbing somthing that does not work will do nothing but cause said vampire to be really mad. GARLIC really! Besides it being the reason twinbeds were invented I mean really bad breath may make one wish they was dead. If one is undead then food is not likely to kill them. Cutting off a head or fire yes this is plausable.
I personally think you have watched to much hollywood and not read enough about the subject of vampires. However that is only opinion and not based on fact. Lastly zombies would not go after vampires as they are both undead. Zombies need LIVING flesh to survive.
041112
Newbie
Most can probably claim to have no firsthand encounters with vampires or zombies.
As has virtually always been the case, what, substantively, enters into lore regarding subject matter that the vast majority of people have no firsthand account of is, historically, based, at least in part, on true tales of what was done in the past. Originally, in fact, the argument can be made that such was the chief means of passing important knowledge on to future generations. The classic vampire movies all, it seems to me, clearly demonstrate this.
Indeed, the classic horror movies were often so successful and "believable" because, again, the vast majority of people had, for example, heard repeated frightening tales of what their great great great aunt, or similar, said back in the "homeland".
lore -> books(writings) -> films(movies)
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-18334106
I have, essentially, watched no television for years now.
As has virtually always been the case, what, substantively, enters into lore regarding subject matter that the vast majority of people have no firsthand account of is, historically, based, at least in part, on true tales of what was done in the past. Originally, in fact, the argument can be made that such was the chief means of passing important knowledge on to future generations. The classic vampire movies all, it seems to me, clearly demonstrate this.
Indeed, the classic horror movies were often so successful and "believable" because, again, the vast majority of people had, for example, heard repeated frightening tales of what their great great great aunt, or similar, said back in the "homeland".
lore -> books(writings) -> films(movies)
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-18334106
I have, essentially, watched no television for years now.
OfTheDamned
The Friendly Undead
Hello. Sitting right here.
jmar
Nexican
I was ninja'd before I happened upon this thread. No bias but OTD wins every time...no question!
041112
Newbie
Well, I did say:
But, I might say I am not so sure about you.
OfTheDamned
The Friendly Undead
Give it time and you'll be just as sure as everyone else.
Petrah
Psychotic Female
041112
Newbie
That is only because they are under contract; they still make a lot of money for the "franchise". When they(Supernatural) stop making money for the franchise they will, likely, not win in some cliffhanger type episode ...
Ashleygray
Newbie
Vampire would become infectected while dieing would rip zombies head off draw!
