Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The private sector has made the mess of health care delivery that exists right now in the United States.
The private sector has made the mess of health care delivery that exists right now in the United States.
Oh? What's the daily room charge for? Use of a bed-sized piece of real estate and the bed?
The private sector has made the mess of health care delivery that exists right now in the United States.
In my honest opinion? It's an itemization that they can charge back to the Insurance companies and get reimbursed for.
If they simply charged you the market price of the items that you used... they wouldn't recoup enough money to pay the operating expenses they have in providing that care for you.
The money to pay for the nurses, administrative staff, janitorial staff, liability insurance, malpractice insurance, etc... doesn't come out of thin air. It comes from the overpricing of materials you use.
You may not like it. But, your alternatives are that the hospital goes out of business, and I think you would like that even less.
I don't buy into the conservative credo that we all exist to enrich corporations and their executives and owners.
When execs arn 500 to 5000 times more than the average worker, something is drastically wrong.
Perhaps the tax rates of the Republican Eisenhower era would help.
Actually, I think tax rates on the wealthy are far too low, and by the "standards and definitions" bandied about, my wife and I individually are among the wealthy.
Here is the important thing: have you read the bill as passed? Sad if you were to vote and you did not read the entire bill. It is more than 2,000 pages and most of those people that voted yes did not read the bill. That fact alone is scary because they did not read it, they were voting blind.
Bob
In my honest opinion? It's an itemization that they can charge back to the Insurance companies and get reimbursed for.
If they simply charged you the market price of the items that you used... they wouldn't recoup enough money to pay the operating expenses they have in providing that care for you.
The money to pay for the nurses, administrative staff, janitorial staff, liability insurance, malpractice insurance, etc... doesn't come out of thin air. It comes from the overpricing of materials you use.
You may not like it. But, your alternatives are that the hospital goes out of business, and I think you would like that even less.
The daily room charge includes all those items the hospital cannot charge for individually, and that includes nurses and all the usual administrative and overhead items, and, of course, profit. Lots of profit.
In my opinion, we shouldn't have private hospitals that exist mainly to turn a profit. Hospitals should be publicly owned or run by universities where "profits" are used to treat indigents and promote medical research. There should also be close and tight oversight of every hospital's books by representatives of the public.
I'd also get the health insurers out of the health insurance business, other than, maybe, the processing of claims. Health insurers add nothing to the health of Americans and in many cases interfere with it.
I'm impressed with medical professionals. I'm not impressed with hospitals and insurance companies motivated by profit.
The daily room charge includes all those items the hospital cannot charge for individually, and that includes nurses and all the usual administrative and overhead items, and, of course, profit. Lots of profit.
In my opinion, we shouldn't have private hospitals that exist mainly to turn a profit. Hospitals should be publicly owned or run by universities where "profits" are used to treat indigents and promote medical research. There should also be close and tight oversight of every hospital's books by representatives of the public.
I'd also get the health insurers out of the health insurance business, other than, maybe, the processing of claims. Health insurers add nothing to the health of Americans and in many cases interfere with it.
I'm impressed with medical professionals. I'm not impressed with hospitals and insurance companies motivated by profit.
The government and all it's mandates and regulations has made the mess of health care delivery that exists right now in the United States.

Regulatianz SUK
Look the financial industry does fine with minimal interference - wait a minute![]()
^^^ Oh puhlease
Ireland had one of the least regulated banking industries in the world
You sir just spit out whatever you read in your far right websites and news leaflets
Please go back to school before posting again

Know not claimAnd perhaps you can claim that the failure of Irish banks was do to them being unregulated.
You cannot not centrally plan an economy. You must allow it to go up and down on it's own.[/wuote]ah comunism = bad
Communism = big government
Government = bad
I get it
Keep thinking what you think, as long as it doesnt hurt anyone (although if you vote it does)
.... are Ireland and the US so different?I don't pretend to know what's best for Ireland, so having you come here and tell us what's best for America holds no weight.
Both are full of greedy pigs who will expoit lack of regulation and regulatory flaws to make millions, At the expense of working people like YOU
They took from your pension fund, and caused (and will further caused) your taxes to go up
If regulations had been enforced, updated and strengthened, we would be suffering a minor reccession now not a pseudo-depression
I dont have PC access atmDid you even watch the video?



Interesting, I wonder how many were in the pockets of vested interestsWell let me explain it to you briefly. The video shows democrats in a congressional hearing about Fannie & Freddie. It shows the democrats insulting the regulator, calling him a racist and accusing him of lying and blowing the pending housing crisis out of proportion. So what good are regulations when the party in this country who supports massive regulation ignores the regulator??

fair enough"we also have regulations:
do you want
your shop selling contamintaed food"
We don't need federal regulations to stop the spread of contaminated food. We have states that can do this. We also have laws against this.
If you get sick or if someone dies, there are legal remedies for this.
prevention is betterYou'd be surprisedAlso, tell me which company stays in business by selling contaminated food?

I was refering to false reportingI don't want state run media telling me what is wrong or isn't.
Me tooI want diverse news outlets and have the ability to discern the truth.
It was an example of medical negligence"your doctor not reading you x-ray"
I have no idea what you are talking about, but I'm sure we don't need some sort of regulation for a doctor to read my x-rays.
But they dont"your bank recklessly trading"
Again, my state can write laws to prevent this from happening. If I enter to an agreement with a bank (contract) than I have the ability to sue them for acting reckless.
It invented futures and hedge funds?BTW, you do realize that the FDIC (government program) basically opened the door for reckless banking, right??
Not really, IMO states should run most thingsYou like big federal government.
huhThat is not freedom.
huhI like small federal government, that's freedom.
huhYou want a centralized gov't planning every part of your life, I don't.
what utopia?So tell me again how this freedoms works in your utopia?
Lets thank Dubya for that"OK?"
Actually, no it's not OK. Someone on these boards said it best, every time a new law is passed, we lose a little bit more of our freedoms.

What big government programs apart from healthcare (which IMO should be state run)?"And I am all for fiscal responsiblity BTW, isnt that conservative"
Really, well then how do you plan on paying for all your big government programs? That's not conservatism. You have no idea what it is to be conservative/libertarian judging by your posts here.