I'm sorry, but i did not know we were talking about trans people. why are we talking about the .001% of our population? might as well talk about men who have 3 nipples.If you're a left-winger, and if you want to reject the transgender/LGBT movement: Good for you. But untill the left as a whole rejects the idea you can chose your gender, that someone with two X chromanones and a uterus can be a man: The left will be subject to well-deserved ridicule!
Have you been living under a rock for the past couple of decades? Are you seriously trying to tell me that the left (at least in the US and Europe) had not embraced transgenderism?
Well, if you really want a source for what I've claimed about the left, here's an article from The Atlantic (hardly a peddler of right wing conspiracy). But I think we both know: This goes way beyond that one article from the Atlantic! This is all over the left.
Replace "rednecks and hillbillies" with "black people", "poor people", or whatever, and ask yourself if that statement sounds bigoted.
yes, it is possible for trans men ( women who transitioned to men) to get pregnant. but do you know how often that happens? not much really. it is really, really, really rare....in fact it is so insignificant that i fail to here any Democrat even mention such a thing.
and what is wrong with transgenderism? i believe anybody can be whatever they want to be. it is their God given right to be themselves.
and from the article:
yep, did not know this is an issue......you know why, because this is a tiny political "niche" as the article stated. who really cares? not me.Americans who don’t mainline niche political or linguistic fights probably don’t even know this is a debate.
Last edited: