mgillespie
Well-Known Member
Seems so. Although, even if what you're saying is right, doesnt that mean that, Sony suck? If they cant deal with multi platform?.
Of course it can deal with multiplatform and slower P2P gaming, but what annoys PS3 owners is that we have to deal with with crappier networking in multiplatform games JUST because Microsoft forces P2P on XboxLive, and developers don't want to implement 2 seperate networking setups for their multiplatform games.
Dedicated servers are faster and easier to setup and develop for, this is why the PC has used them for years, and it's also why PS3 exclusives also use them.
You can eat hamburgers on PS3, but you just keep thinking "I could be easting steak right now"...
It's the same old story though with multiplatform titles it's compromise, both the Xbox and PS3 exclusives always look better than the multiplatform titles, the PS3 suffers the most thou, as the gap is considerably bigger between what PS3 exclusives offer and multiplats compared to Xbox exclusives and multiplats. In other words when talking multiplatform games 9 times out of 10 it's the Xbox holding the PS3 back rather than the other way round.
Oh I can also post some random picture of proper games on PS3, I don't really see what the point was...
I pointed out that PS3 uses Dedicated servers for it's exclusives, something that is pretty much universally accepted as the better gaming network setup, or are you the 0.00001% that disagree with that statement? (or more likely delude yourself that your $50 you pay to play online on a P2P network is value for money).
.

