Wired review
Bigger, But Not Better
Rating: 5/10
Review: Samsung Galaxy Note II Smartphone
Wow, That review really ticks me off on how some things are totally inaccurate.
here is my response, in case it doesn't get published over there.
OK, for starters, the review is basically a writers personal opinion of the device, lets not jump on the bandwagon that its a paid Apple advertisement, etc. It is his choice to write what he feels and his editors are free to post it for all to see. But, there are a few points that I see that are totally incorrect or not even touched upon in the write up. Therefore...
The appetite for these types of devices, particularly in Asia, is not totally true. it may seem like that but that is only because the 1st & 2nd Notes were distributed overseas first and thus would have a much bigger bottom line of sales. Domestically, the 1st Note was only on AT&T, the second are now being offered on all major carriers.
The device is a phone first, tablet second (some may disagree and reverse that), but a phone nonetheless. No one really cares if you hold it up to your face to make a call and complain "oh it's too big", "oh, I can't see your face", unless you are in high school. IF anyone is concerned what others might think about holding the device to your head, then I suggest using headphones, Bluetooth etc. I rather have the microphone closer to my mouth than near my nose.
Also to Note (pun intended), Samsung has not once, previously, now and probably in the future, call these devices phablets. That was a word created by the online, bloggers, reviewers, etc. And as much as I hate to admit it, that word will be part of the lexicon of our vocabulary since everyone has taken it to describe these devices instead of what they really are, hybrids. Phablets sound cooler than hybrids, or intermediate devices.
I also find it amusing that the buying public (as well as the media at large) that is complaining about the size of these type of devices, do not mind carrying around a 8, 9, 10 inch tablet and not complain about having to use two hands. At least with the Notes I & II, it is more compact yet gives you the necessary screen size without having to make it truly unbearable to use as a phone, camera, recorder, digitizer, note taker, etc. Basically its a all-in-one device that can still be pocketable.
With devices as large as these, folks need to start retraining themselves from the one hand approach so many have accustomed themselves. I for one wouldn't feel safe using one hand without dropping it. (That goes for any device, regardless of size). Granted, one can use it one handed. It takes practice and knowing your limitations of how far your fingers can go or do on such a big screen. Then there are aftermarket add-ons that perform dual role by adding a cover or gripper to insert their fingers and allow your thumbs to reach all points of the screen. But the device is really made for two handed use mainly because of the inclusion of the S-Pen.
Call it what you will, it is not a stylus. A stylus is a dumb down pointer, which as much as I would hate to admit, Steve Jobs of Apple was correct. If it has a stylus, then they are doing it wrong. But the difference here is it is not a stylus, it's a S-Pen. Is the S for Samsung, no, S for Super. It allows you to do much ,much more than a regular stylus. Cut and paste, multiple levels of pressure, hover notifications, etc. This alone helps viewing websites that have sub-levels of menus, which can't be accessed using your finger or a traditional non-smart stylus. Some find it gimmicky but many find it quite useful.
It also has a Wiacom digitizer, which for all intent and purposes, is phenomenal for those that take notes, paint, etc. Granted there are those that complain about the screen resolution not being on par as the Apple retina ones. But find me a Wiacom digitizer screen with a higher resolution and that can fit in the current Notes size that would not increase the price of the device by hundreds and I'll pay you your Note.
The statement of "The Note II largely runs the same software as the S III" is incorrect. The Note II has the latest Android OS. SIII is just getting it. The Note II has hover view, multi-view apps, etc which the SIII does not. The Touchwiz UI is the best I've seen yet, and certainly the best out of Motorolas' Blur, and HTCs' Sense. Granted there are pure android enthusiasts that prefer Stock Android, and that's fine. But one can easily download a launcher of their choice if need be.
As for S-Voice, it is just like Siri. Siri is okay, but it chokes on some questions, and lets not get into the part of dialects or having an accent, then it really gets all hay-wired The same goes for S-Voice. it is the start of the technology which in time will greatly improve both Apple and Android wise. But for simple questions, they both do the job well.
Is the device perfect, no. Quite a few things can be improved and probably will be both software wise (with a few updates) and hardware wise (in the next Note 3). But compared to what is out there, the Note II is a phenomenal device that really will be hard to match in terms of features, design and productivity. I for one would have not given it a 5, but closer to a 8.5 - 9.
TS