Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hithere,Yes, the X's bleed out when wet. I had to argue with a Verizon rep in a store once. She saw the pristine red X's and said I had water damage. Ignorance may be bliss, but the ignorance of someone else is frustrating!
Hithere,
Just dropped my S3 in the toilet and the labels have red X on them. Does that indicate water damage? should they be blue?
Thanks
I have a Tmobile GS3 and the stickeron the battery and behind the battery are both pure white. Sounds like perhaps Verizon has different water damage stickers?
HI.
My 11 month-old literally licked my new SIII a couple of times, and it wouldnt charge over the w/end. I took it to the vodafone shop where the assistant techie told me that it had water damage. ( the inside sticker showed blue crosses on a white background). Northnig was red. He has sent the phone to the engineers...
my question to the forum is: is my phone a write-off? ( it wouldnt power up because it ran out of battery, and it wouldnt charge). Was there really moisture damage?
Any expert advice would be gratefully received...
Thanks
Peegee
I have a Tmobile GS3 and the stickeron the battery and behind the battery are both pure white. Sounds like perhaps Verizon has different water damage stickers?

True. I hate big business but even if i (a skin headed hippy) owned a business and you handed me back something id made claiming it was faulty BEFORE youd damaged it, id have to politely say "no, just no". Sorry :beer:
Ive just thought of this.. imagine samsung had repaired the charging problem and you still dropped it in the pool... would you still expect them to fix that?![]()
:beer:In the above situation, I wouldn't expect them to fix it because they would have already done their part by fixing my defective device. The terms of agreement spell out everything quite clearly, and they are liable for any defective device. If they didn't have any liability I would have been written off by Samsung immediately, but since my claim is actually valid if the product was defective before the water damage occurred, it's in Samsung's best interest to analyze my phone and officially declare water damage was the culprit of all of my phone's issues. After reading the warranty, the importance of establishing a timeline as well as what or who is culpable for all of the phone's problems becomes very evident. Also, it wouldn't be too difficult to tell whether or not the issue with the phone was caused by water without only looking at the water damage indicators. In this case, One would be able to see if the device was defective because of a faulty part or actual damage from water. That is just another reason why Samsung's procedure is flawed. It not only violates the rights of the consumer, but it disregards the important timeline in order to save time. Just imagine you spilled a little water on your phone-not enough to do any damage but just enough to set off an indicator. Then, imagine after 5 more months of use your headphone jack stops working properly. According to Samsung, your warranty is void even though the water was in no way responsible for the defect in your product. The terms are very clear in stating that water damage does not void the warranty, but rather damage from water is not covered. I am basically certain that Samsung will do nothing to fix my device, but I am certain that what they are doing is illegal.


OK, best case Samsung replaces the charging port and then sends you a water damaged phone back. Phone still not going to work correctly.