There are two widely used formats .dsf and .dff. .dff is not compressible and not tag-able... equivalent to a .wav file. .dsf is compressible and is tag-able... equivalent to a .flac file.nevermind should have googled it first.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There are two widely used formats .dsf and .dff. .dff is not compressible and not tag-able... equivalent to a .wav file. .dsf is compressible and is tag-able... equivalent to a .flac file.nevermind should have googled it first.
This sounds somewhat proprietary. Is there DRM to be dealt with (cracked) as well?There are two widely used formats .dsf and .dff. .dff is not compressible and not tag-able... equivalent to a .wav file. .dsf is compressible and is tag-able... equivalent to a .flac file.
I was checking out the 32 bit audio on the v20 and am very unimpressed. It sounds like it slightly boost the treble. Very very weak and falsely advertised.
That's irrelevant. LG advertised that it makes music sound better in general. It doesn't have enough of a good impact to justify $800. This phone is a big phony. They lied about the camera performance too.Do you know anything about the provenance of the recordings that you are testing? Can you supply a sample so that we can test it on our V20 and our other DACs to provide feedback? Have you opened it up in any software that can tell you if it is clipping or really uses the 32 bit dynamic range?
No, you don't. It's a curse and expensive.I wish I was an audiophile.
That's irrelevant. LG advertised that it makes music sound better in general. It doesn't have enough of a good impact to justify $800. This phone is a big phony. They lied about the camera performance too.
I was about to type the exact same thing.No, you don't. It's a curse and expensive.
I have a pair of Sony MDR-V55 headphones with an impedance of 40. I noticed someone said earlier that an impedance of 50-100 is needed to take advantage of the HIFI audio. I do notice a big difference when I crank those little dials up all the way though. Could someone explain "impedance" to me? My apologies if it was covered in one of the 30 something posts.
OK! Finally! LG has confirmed that there is an issue with access to the ES9218 DAC. I was able to prove it to them and they confirmed that it is now in their queue to fix. They actually admitted that they never tested the DAC above standard definition files.
The DAC made me choose this phone over the others and like you, I'm pissed that LG did not bother to make it available to 3rd party developers. I don't much care for the stock app.
If you search the Reddit forum on V20, a user claims that Tmobile fixed this issue in their latest update. I have the international variant and cannot confirm it.
OK! Finally! LG has confirmed that there is an issue with access to the ES9218 DAC. I was able to prove it to them and they confirmed that it is now in their queue to fix. They actually admitted that they never tested the DAC above standard definition files.
as far as I know it got fixed with a security patch probably the January one.
Reason I saw that - using Jet audio and playing the LG song that comes on the phone. it reports the output as 192Kbps vs the other files I have on the phone reporting 44100 or 48000 - which I know they are.
I put on another HQ flac file I have and it also reported it correctly as a 192Kbps output. SO I believe it's been fixed. Either by LG or by google as I'm not 100% sure where the hold up was
Yep I know - Jet Audio does the same. File info vs Output.
I'm on VZ and I think I'm also only on a January update. Software version is 13A