• After 15+ years, we've made a big change: Android Forums is now Early Bird Club. Learn more here.

The "Linux questions (and other stuff)" thread

Last night, as I was taking off my Never trust an OS you don't have sources for baseball jersey

IMG_20190115_153115.jpg
something popped into my head. :eek:

The slogan obviously refers to Linux, and just as obviously is a knock against Micro$oft.

But what about Android? Are we privy to its source code? And can this slogan serve the dual purpose of also taking a jab at Apple?

(Yes, OF COURSE I could Google this, but then I'd have nothing to post right now, nor could I show off one of my favorite designs. :p)
 
Last edited:
MoodyBlues said:
Last night, as I was taking off my Never trust an OS you don't have sources for baseball jersey,

View attachment 139026
something popped into my head.
eek.png


The slogan obviously refers to Linux, and just as obviously is a knock against Micro$oft.

But what about Android? Are we privy to its source code? And can this slogan serve the dual purpose of also taking a jab at Apple?

(Yes, OF COURSE I could Google this, but then I'd have nothing to post right now, nor could I show off one of my favorite designs.
stickouttongue.png
)
Click to expand...

Android is OpenSource for now, hence all our ROM building here in AF & XDA ;)
 
Yeh, Android itself is open source, AOSP (Android Open Source Project). And of course it runs on the Linux kernel. However GMS (Google Mobile Services), which is Play Store, Gmail, YouTube, etc. are not. Also manufacturers may put their own stuff in, make their own changes etc, and that may be proprietary as well. Like their own launchers, system apps, etc.

There's open source apps as well, that can be found in repos like F-Droid. Never trust the apps you don't have sources for! :thumbsupdroid:

If you didn't want to useanything GMS, e.g. Play Store, and had a custom ROM on your phone or tablet, and only use apps from repos like F-Droid, yeh you can be completely open source with it.
 
Last edited:
Today I got to witness a rare sight: a Linux computer booting up!

MVIMG_20190118_130147089.jpg


This is the 10+ year old desktop running an ancient version of Kubuntu.

Though she denies it, I believe that Joy Noelle is the culprit. The 'computer' switch on the surge protector had mysteriously been turned off. :o Of course, since she's not supposed to get up on that desk, it couldn't have been her. :D

I don't know what its uptime was, but it definitely hadn't been rebooted intentionally for a long time. You know, unlike that OTHER operating system. :blushDroid:
 
MoodyBlues said:
Today I got to witness a rare sight: a Linux computer booting up!

This is the 10+ year old desktop running an ancient version of Kubuntu.

Though she denies it, I believe that Joy Noelle is the culprit. The 'computer' switch on the surge protector had mysteriously been turned off. :eek: Of course, since she's not supposed to get up on that desk, it couldn't have been her. :D

I don't know what its uptime was, but it definitely hadn't been rebooted intentionally for a long time. You know, unlike that OTHER operating system. :blushDroid:
Click to expand...

Although let's be fair and say that Linux systems do need to reboot when things like kernel updates are pushed out. Your old system probably doesn't receive major updates any more. But hey, if it ain't broke.. ;)
 
LV426 said:
Although let's be fair and say that Linux systems do need to reboot when things like kernel updates are pushed out.
Click to expand...
True, kernel updates and installing hardware.
Your old system probably doesn't receive major updates any more. But hey, if it ain't broke.. ;)
Click to expand...
I have all my computers set not to auto-update anything, so the last time I updated it was...awhile ago. Of course I could upgrade its Kubuntu version, though its hardware may not be up to the more recent versions.

But--as you said--if it ain't broke! And it isn't. Its only use now is via other computers on my network: accessing files, printing, etc. So my plans for it are to let it die a natural death and then not replace it. *gasp* I just simply no longer need a computer, or in this case, two, in every room.
 
On a different subject, I'm trying to resurrect my Lego Mindstorms kit for my daughter, but it's so old (RCX v2 brick) that the programming application only runs on Windows XP. You'd think Microsoft would be giving that away now. But I'd still need a license key.
Lego never released a Linux version of RCX code, so I'm a bit stuck. Yeah, I could run XP in VirtualBox, but there's still the license key requirement, which I don't have.
 
LV426 said:
On a different subject, I'm trying to resurrect my Lego Mindstorms kit for my daughter, but it's so old (RCX v2 brick) that the programming application only runs on Windows XP. You'd think Microsoft would be giving that away now. But I'd still need a license key.
Lego never released a Linux version of RCX code, so I'm a bit stuck. Yeah, I could run XP in VirtualBox, but there's still the license key requirement, which I don't have.
Click to expand...

Is it old enough to maybe use Mint 15 + Wine? I wouldn't try any Mints older than 15 or you'll have excessive MTP issue.. Min17.3 may even be better but I always had issues getting anything to work on Wine, especially when it required them dang drivers..
 
bcrichster said:
Is it old enough to maybe use Mint 15 + Wine? I wouldn't try any Mints older than 15 or you'll have excessive MTP issue.. Min17.3 may even be better but I always had issues getting anything to work on Wine, especially when it required them dang drivers..
Click to expand...

Yeah thanks for the suggestion, it's worth a try. But you're right, from previous experience Wine has been a bit patchy, and if driver issues come into play, which I expect they will since this thing uses an IR transmitter, it might not be too successful.
 
You know that pic I posted of one of my PCs booting up? I didn't remember which version of Kubuntu it was running, but I knew that the computer was 10+ years old, and that I hadn't updated it in a long time. So I checked...

Just for shits and giggles, I thought I'd post its version: 9.10, Karmic Koala. :o

BTW, my first version of Ubuntu was 5.04, Hoary Hedgehog. Seems like yesterday, but also like a million years ago, if that makes any sense.
 
MoodyBlues said:
You know that pic I posted of one of my PCs booting up? I didn't remember which version of Kubuntu it was running, but I knew that the computer was 10+ years old, and that I hadn't updated it in a long time. So I checked...

Just for shits and giggles, I thought I'd post its version: 9.10, Karmic Koala. :eek:

BTW, my first version of Ubuntu was 5.04, Hoary Hedgehog. Seems like yesterday, but also like a million years ago, if that makes any sense.
Click to expand...

That's ancient in computing terms. My history with Linux goes back years too. I dabbled with Red Hat in the 1990's (which was the only distro at the time!). I then had a long period away from the O/S. When I returned to the world of Linux in around 2010, with Ubuntu 11.10 (I think), I could not believe the difference. The ease of install was amazing. So much more user friendly. It's just gone on improving from there really. People get nervous about the command line, but actually there's not much necessity to use it these days, if you really don't want to.
 
Painful? My experience is completely opposite, Slackware caught my eye back in 2001 or so (I believe that would have been Slackware 7.1?) while doing a lot of distro-hopping and it's been my primary desktop and laptop OS since 2003.
 
Painful in that it took me more than four hours to install because I went with the verbose manual install. Which, incidentally, taught me much of the internal workings of Linux (the point of the exercise), but also resulted in me having a CLI with no GUI, and this old guy was not content with running pure CLI for the first time in a decade.
 
LV426 said:
That's ancient in computing terms.
Click to expand...
Although I haven't actually seen it in years, somewhere in my garage exists a 3.5" diskette containing Linux release 0.1 (*if* memory serves me) from 1991.
My history with Linux goes back years too. I dabbled with Red Hat in the 1990's (which was the only distro at the time!). I then had a long period away from the O/S. When I returned to the world of Linux in around 2010, with Ubuntu 11.10 (I think), I could not believe the difference. The ease of install was amazing. So much more user friendly. It's just gone on improving from there really. People get nervous about the command line, but actually there's not much necessity to use it these days, if you really don't want to.
Click to expand...
I was using the UNIX clone, Coherent, before Linux entered the picture. Over the years I've tried many Linux distros, and found each had its pros and cons.

I was using Caldera before ultimately settling on Kubuntu as my default OS. I was still dabbling with other distros until my most recent long illness. As I recall now, I liked Mint and Slackware, and had resurrected an old HP laptop with Bodhi. I still have a Red Hat book and an install CD sitting around here.

As for the command line: I think today's Linux distros have made things SO EASY--from installation to configuring hardware automatically--that no one ever needs to see the CLI unless they want to. So your average window$ user--like my late mother--can transition to Linux and never even see anything but its GUI. Me? I LOVE the command line! I still do all my real work there.
 
Dngrsone said:
Painful in that it took me more than four hours to install because I went with the verbose manual install. Which, incidentally, taught me much of the internal workings of Linux (the point of the exercise), but also resulted in me having a CLI with no GUI, and this old guy was not content with running pure CLI for the first time in a decade.
Click to expand...
Hmmm... The last time I installed Slackware--and I ALWAYS install manually--it took nowhere near four hours (more like 30(?) minutes), and was fully functioning, including its GUI. Did you run into problems? Or, as you mentioned, simply learning about Linux as you moved through its installation?

And I haven't seen a CLI-only Linux in decades! What on earth were you using 10 years earlier?! :)
 
svim said:
Painful? My experience is completely opposite, Slackware caught my eye back in 2001 or so (I believe that would have been Slackware 7.1?) while doing a lot of distro-hopping and it's been my primary desktop and laptop OS since 2003.
Click to expand...

I'm reminded of a rather thick book and bundled CD-ROM I bought back in the day...
9780672317682.jpg

And I never did get it "Unleashed".
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom