nygiants10
Newbie
Just cuirous if it is majorly improved or just a flashy name to sell to verizon customers
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Just cuirous if it is majorly improved or just a flashy name to sell to verizon customers
Are you new to the site? This phone is a major improvement over the EVO. VZW over Sprint, 2nd Gen Snapdragon Processor, Super LCD over LCD. I am there are plenty more others will point out. I would suggest reading as there are many threads asking the same question you just did.

er... I'm not new to this site and I have the same question. Of course, since we're nice to newbies and oldbies, we'll take the question seriously, right?
This is a "second gen" snapdragon? That's the first I hear of that. What's the difference. I know this phone will have a bit more ram, but is it really a MAJOR upgrade from the evo?

"(The Thunderbolt) runs the updated Snapdragon and improvement is stunning. the newer smaller chip improves in heat handling, power consumption and provides much better graphics power then the last iteration." <--- From Black Man X![]()

, but i have heard people say the Thunderbolt does get better scores, i just cant find an image to confirm)The Thunderbolt actually has higher Quadrant Scores than the BionicFood for thought.
)EDIT*** Sorry, i ment to say the Samsung Galaxy S, and Nexus S, but the score is 1926, which is only about 100 off of the Bionic, but this is WITHOUT motoblur on the Bionic, when moto skins the Bionic up, the scores will probably fall.
HTC Thunderbolt 4G Tested, 2X Faster than Samsung Galaxy S | News, Reviews, Gadget Database
Sorry For the confusion (and if i was a sales person, i would know the release date and wouldn't have to ask, but i have heard people say the Thunderbolt does get better scores, i just cant find an image to confirm)
hmm... you got me curious, now, as I do have 4g here.![]()
It would actually be 300 below the Bionic as the Bionic has come in at 2284. Thats without the test even knowing what the processor was and not optimized for dual core operation.
So then the question becomes, outside of high end games will the Bionic be noticeably faster then the Thunderbolt?
Droid Bionic Quadrant results out | AndroidOS.in
The newer snapdragon has the following benefits:
Much better GPU. The older snapdragon (on the Inc, EVO, etc) ha an inferior GPU. One of the reasons it stayed viable is that all the other processors on the market (ignoring for now tegra--we are looking at ones in phones in the past year) were ARM cortex-A8 chips. The Hummingbird and OMAP are just slightly modified A8's, and thus they performed better than a stock A8. HTC said that they would use the ARMv7 instruction set (the same one all the other processors use), but that they would build their own processing core and call it Scorpion. The Scorpion core is much more optimized than the slightly modified A8 cores, and thus even with the vastly inferior GPU, the first gen snapdragons were real competitors in the SOC market.
Now, with a fairly good GPU, the second gen should fly. And, if the MT4G is any example, it does.
The second gen is also a 45nm process as possed to the 65nm of the first gen. This leads to more transistors per area of space = more processing power. Also, with the decreased printing length comes lower resistance, so each transistor takes less energy to use (this is a simplification--PM me for more scientific explanations).
-Nkk
Going to a smaller manufacturing process does not equal more processing power. It just means it consumes less heat and power.There actually has to be enhancements in the design for it to have more processing power. Look at Intel's line of chips. They have come out with newer versions of the "same" chips-sole difference was the manufacturing process. They did not have more processing power. They were just able to put them into laptops, etc
Y'kidding me? Seriously? Me, I'm nauseatedly sick of my DX's locked bootloader and I'm a fan of Sense UI. (Are you a salesman for HtC , or somphin'?)
It would actually be 300 below the Bionic as the Bionic has come in at 2284. Thats without the test even knowing what the processor was and not optimized for dual core operation.
So then the question becomes, outside of high end games will the Bionic be noticeably faster then the Thunderbolt?
Droid Bionic Quadrant results out | AndroidOS.in