themuffinman75
Android Enthusiast
You are the one that starting arguing it. I simply said that it was clever and I can see the commercial. Yes it is an obscure piece of information but it can add some character to a "year ago" campaign. If Vegas did put odds on it the odds of Sprint doing the year anniversary would absolutely be higher, but the pay off on the latter would be greater.
And Jon Stewart is a person not an idea so it doesn't really correlate but if John Stewart had invented 3D cameras or movies or whatever then yes his birthday might work.
I mostly agree with this; and one of the additions to the campaign could use the 3d movie tie in to add to it.
Let me repeat what I am saying:
1) I think the tie in with 3d is clever
2) I think the year anniversary still applies even though it is 7 days later (and yes I know it still isn't the first Friday in June)
3) I do not think that Sprint is going to use that particular 3d idea
4) I hope beyond hope that it is released on the 3rd but who knows
Picture this though: Think of the Evo Firsts commercial
A visual timeline starting on June 10th, 1915 (even though some 3-d patents were filed in the 1890's) with 3d testing in a theater, September 1922 first viewing by a paying audience, 1953 Huge year for 3d movies, the 60's, 70's, 80's, 90's, 2000's, (images or clips from 3d films in all the years), 2010 movies like Avatar, 2011 Show the Evo3d. "June 2010 we brought you America's First 4g Phone. Today , 96 years in the making, we bring you America's first 3d phone. No Glasses Required for this Evolution" Or something along these lines.
Personally, it sounds good to me and it makes perfect sense. You have to market those features that no one else have even if most of us geeks may think its a gimmick. Just the thought of viewing 3d content without the need for glasses and with mobile 3d content being free to no more than few dollars extra, that could easily build a whole lot of interest for consumers who would otherwise not give a damn about 3d. We all have said it, the average consumer don't care about single core vs dual core or tegra 2 vs qualcomm vs exynos, they care about the end user experience and thats basically it. A 3d mobile device can "potentially" enhance the user experience quite a bit but we wont know until we use the phone but in the mean time thats what they will be marketing since no one else has a 3d phone.