To expand upon this a little bit, did HTC and Verizon do a similar process by using Intel to help with things with the Incredible, or did Sprint only contract you guys to help due to it being 4G? How does what you work on impact battery life? Does what you helped do increase battery performance over a contemporary device like the HTC Incredible?
I love these questions..really

The Snapdragon processor is identical to Incredible and EVO. Accept for one thing, the 4g radio was incorporated into the microprocessor. This was not performed by Intel, but Qualcomm. Unlike a stereotypical desktop processor, there are no mobile devices built into the chip. I.E. GSM, GPS, GPU, CPU, Wifi, 3g/EVO's case 4G. Qualcomm is responsible for the extremely difficult proc that can fit on your finger nail. I have seen similar proc under a high power microscope and this one has got to be a thing of beauty.
Samsung hummingbird on the other hand was not able to do this and ther GPU is outside of the CPU and dedicated processor. I.e it would have to run two procs on one batt supply.
Intel on the other hand invented WiMax back in 1997 and has intimate knowledge about how it works. Portland, Or. is the first test bed for WiMax in 1998 funded by Intel. (Free for Metro Portland area)
I can say yes the Snapdragon processor for EVO is about efficient as a proc can get at 1ghz and that Intel polished over the 4G software for flawless operation, must notably is EVO will sense 4G/3G area's and no longer require manual switch as shown in CTIA.
I can say that were able to reduce power requirment for both Wifi radio and 4G by 35% or 1/3 on EVO. I personally used EVO stress testing data streaming w/8 devices tethered for 4 hours no problem. I have not on the other hand tested it as a personal device, but feel confident in saying. 8 hours of mild data use should be acceptable. The 1500mah batt is larg and seem to hold a good charge for the average consumer.
BSOD>-_O<