SamsungVibrant: EM+ is the Even More Plus plan that I am on.
VegasTech: I agree with you, GPS is a nice feature to have, it works, but I am too more anxious for 2.2.
- $500 upfront, or $199 + a 2 year contract. Essentially the same thing if you're stuck with a phone missing important functionality.
I'm sorry, that is correct, but every phone has an underline cost doesn't it? So if you're not EM+, consider yourself luckier than me, I had to pay more. I agree there is an issue here, I am pointing out the logical side of the argument. It isn't missing functionality, it functions, but the standards are poor right, we don't get the full scope of enhanced reception right? You open up any app that tests, even the built in app, if you see anything that shows a signal, the GPS function works, it just may not be software/drivers working to interpret the signals to get a lock.
Lets get to the core here. I have tested this at work today, I have a GPS Repeater in the hangar where I work. At home here in the house, I was getting signals of 20-30 for the best signals. In the hangar with the repeater I was getting 40-50. I doubt there is a hardware issue, otherwise, there wouldn't be any signals reported at all. You wouldn't see them, I wouldn't see them, bob, john, jacob, joseph and mary wouldn't see a signal if the GPS receiver wasn't working. Lets cut to the point and get to what is actually causing our problems and work on solving those instead of arguing over what we think is causing the problem.
- There has been zero confirmation that BH_Man's flash fixed the GPS issues. Besides, one would have to root their phone for this..
There might not be any confirmation, but he seems to be putting more hard work into it than anyone else I know, maybe even Samsung, how would you know how much he has accomplished or not? Right now unless someone confirms it, it is speculative. I do however trust in what he says more, following him from the Behold 2 era of problems, that he knows what he is dealing and talking about. If he sees there is something that can be done, I sure hope he is right. It gives testament to a software fix over a hardware issue in that case.
- I think you misunderstood me. I'll state my point again: Which do you think would compel Samsung more to RUSH a fix out? A bunch of calls, emails, and complaints which can easily be ignored (or replied to with a canned response)? OR Samsung getting 90% of their flagship Galaxy S phones returned?
Lets see, return a phone and pay more fees, or wait for a fix to come which is acknowledge, has been stated by the company (manufacturer), to have a fix coming. I don't think they will or feel compelled to work any faster, no matter how many they get returned. They already know by what you and others stated that if it gets fixed you'll buy it again. Yours and others' loss in fees elsewhere in the end, not their loss. And I doubt you could convince 90% return rate, maybe a 10% but you're dreaming for 90%, that's not how it works. When you vote, voting ends up being a good 50/50, when it starts to get to 60/40 then you better start wondering about other things, but it usually is a good 47/53 for heated races. That is because people are equally divided in their opinions and thoughts. The logic still exists with merchandise, but the return rate I bet you, will never see 30%.
- I, among many other users rely on GPS for a multitude of things. Convenience of not having to lug around a separate GPS unit, for one. By your reasoning, why have a smartphone? You could just as well carry around a netbook/ipad. Granted, the GPS works intermittently...but that's just as bad as saying the phone will make calls half the time. Would it be as acceptable if Samsung acknowledged it, but not give a definite answer otherwise? I think not.
Hmmm...SamsungVibrant stated it well when he did a real world experiment, how many others do you think use their phone for GPS, if they didn't even know they could? GPS units aren't really an inconvenience if you are really needing a GPS unit, again, you can't get maps in remote locations with no data service, what do you use then? I am just wondering, these things I say to you are not to be meant to be taken personal. There is logic here and I want some good proof of how this GPS issue is the end of the world? Samsung has given a definitive answer, maybe not to what you and others are expecting, but they have stated a fix is coming. They don't have to say when or how long, they have their reasoning, and I'd rather they take their time to get it right. I mean, I wouldn't want a GPS issue to come up again after a software fix was released, don't know about anyone else. But if it has caused this much of an issue and outcry, is there really a need to rush the situation?
- Did you just compare Sims 3 to a non-working feature of a smartphone? Rather, let me retort; Would you return your phone if the data/internet worked only about half the time?
Yeah I gave a good logical, valid question to you! If Sims 3 didn't work, or hey, how about Avatar, if those features didn't work, would you return the phone? They are supposed to work, they came with the phone, they are exclusive to T-Mobile. You'd return a phone for a issue that has a fix coming, but not for an issue that might not get fixed? The logic doesn't make sense. I would return the phone if it had real legitimate problem and issue. I am not going to return it over the compass issue, but if the GPS receiver did not function I would return it for that.
The thing is, the GPS receiver is working. I have proven it, others have proven it. I am sure you can run your Vibrant now and prove it again, looking at the signal levels, not a map. The issue comes down to an issue that seems to be it only wants to lock on maybe 4 satellites. I haven't really looked, but are there people getting more than 4 satellites, that haven't done anything to the phone to try and get more? Again, testing in the GPS Repeater environment, it only locked on 4 while the signals were all in the 40-50, except the one over the horizon. It appears that the software is setting a limit of what it will look for, once it has gained the limit set, it stops acquiring other satellites. We can see that the GPS receiver is seeing up to 8, 12, 13, whatever, it sees them all in the atlas, if you have GPS test, the atlas is the world view with the dots all over it, it sees them all. Maybe the software should be tweaked to use the best satellites with the higher signal too.
Comparing to Garmin for a minute, because I have seen real GPS issues. They have non-WAAS units for navigation. Before a software update to 3.03 of the GPS software, the unit would look for a full range of satellites, totalling about 16. After the software, it only looks for maybe 8 at first, then it will open up the receiver more and acquire if there is 12-13 total in the atlas. They did the change through software, it wasn't hardware. I am more than certain the software will address our issue. If you can prove that it is not software, I'd love to hear your talking points.
dietcoke, yes we are experiencing this, the phone is only acquiring about 4 at most, which is good enough for 3d navigation. Probably why the set a limit on the receiver to only lock and acquire on 4 satellites. Maybe it was their idea to begin with, to hey, help save power. Not protecting their downfall but there is a reason why, we may never really know.