I joined this forum just for this post, I'll remain active and add to it, but after reading the following quotes I've been compelled to say something.
Now first off, it's very unlikely that any GPS device is actually showing S/N or signal to noise ratios but rather C/N or carrier to noise ratio. Because C/N tells you how strong the carrier wave is being received, where as S/N is only telling you how clear that wave can be read. A low C/N can make an S/N impossible to figure out, ex. if a person whispering it too silently you can't hear the words well enough to tell what he/she is saying. Thus C/N is more important for this use.
I learned this after about 5 hrs of web research.
And since no users--absolutely none, as far as I can see, on any forum--have ever posted GPS signal to noise figures for these phones that match the numbers on real GPSes, we can only assume these GPSes are all sub-par
and
If it was just a quality control issue, with some phones being good and others not so good, surely the folks with good phones would be able to post objective confirmation of that? Folks out there who simply haven't mentioned that they really have been able to get 50db or better signal strengths from the birds?
Forget the folks who are intimate with GPS, who navigate ships and planes and run surveys, but anyone? Anyone at all? Anyone seen a Captivate post the same s/n numbers as any GPS made in the past five years?
As stated above I'm working on it. Tho i'm still trying out devices to use, i'll post a video of devices side by side with my Cappy. So people can see that the numbers arn't all that poor, and that the C/N of a completely stationary device will fluctuate rather oddly.
Are you getting s/n numbers for the satellites around 30-35db, the typical poor numbers from problem phones? Or has the ROM fix brought that up to 50db or higher, where other GPSes would see them?
Please read here
In this link search "TEST METHODOLOGY"
It explains that 35 dB-Hz is ideal as a higher GPS signal must be "toned down" so it can be understood. My personal best in some prelim testing for the video I'm gonna post was 42 dB-Hz. Tho I must add I have a 1012 build that had 2.1 update-1 already installed right out the box. So I can't speak for all the Cappys out there.
For any one doing comparisons to other GPS devices of phones with GPS as Rred had posted 5 Meters (15 ft) is really the best GPS alone can do. Anything that consistently gets closer then 15 ft MUST be relying on something more. Be it WAAS or the GPS of a different country or some other such
Assistances (aka AGPS) to hone it down, my handheld GPS (designed for hiking) that uses WAAS can be as accurate as 3ft tho thats super rare, 8~12 ft is average.
Here are some links about the accuracy for GPS if you guys need more for convincing.
Garmin
The "offical" GPS site
what Wikipedia has to say
Non-US "GPS"
The FAA
Garmin - WAAS
Wide Area Augmentation System - Wikipedia
Note: WAAS is only for the Continental USA & Canada.
P.S. durring previews of the post the Garmin sites were not consistanly redirecting tho I did everything correct...