SulkyAndroid17
Android Enthusiast
By the way, I do not own nor have ever used a HTC EVO 4G LTE so I don't know how true this is, but I was wondering if anybody could comment on this:
I was told that the EVO 4G LTE originally had an emulated sdcard folder, but that a later firmware update removed that, is there any truth to that?
Wait, why not? Is there some limitations or something on apps just using the internal memory instead of an emulated or physical sdcard?
I know that sdcard0 is also internal space, but I don't understand what you mean by "that I can use". So, why can't just the internal space be used without the sdcard0 symlink?
Before MTP, users couldn't manage internal space. You couldn't connect your device to the computer and transfer files to internal space. You could install apps to internal memory and those apps could place what they wanted there.
Manufacturers were giving users many gigs of internal space, but shipping devices with like a 2GB sd card. Users may potentialy fill that card up, but have tons of free space internally. People didn't like that and neither did Google. So Google removed UMS in favor of MTP so users could better use internal space. Not the greatest solution, but it works I guess.
It's given the sdcard0 name convention because that's exactly how it behaves--like an sdcard. Have you compared the contents of sdcard0 to sdcard1? They're probably near identical.
I'm saying the reason the app is writing to internal is because it thinks the /sdcard or /sdcard0 folder is the mount point for the external sdcard, because that was the external sdcard mountpoint before, and I have seen countless apps exhibit this behavior.
I thought that's what we said? Alright, I'm lost. Do you have any apps in mind? It might help us understand the point your trying to make.
I feel like everyone is arguing different parts of the same answer.