i was watching a bionic review & what i noticed was that for this phone to have only a 1ghz dual core, 512mb of ram & a qHD screen which needs to process 35% more pixels than the galaxy 2 wvga 800x450 screen. the scores that the droid bionic had from quadrant pro was 2800 with the galaxy 2 receiving a score of 3200, both were stock. now think about this for a second & youll notice that the bionic as i said before only has 512mb ram, a qHD screen that needs more processing & only 1ghz dual core cpu. the same was in antutu benchmark, the cpu score was high but i really paid attention to the gpu score which was 2490 for the bionic & the galaxy 2 had 2380, again remember that its a 1ghz with a qHD & 512mb ram on the bionic vs 1.2ghz, 800x450 & 1gig of ram. you can obviously see which of the 2 gives better performance & battery life. the bionic is reviewed to have up to 2 to 3 days of regular use! & a full day & a half of hard video,web & gaming. so with that said if you want you can over clock your bionic up to 1.2ghz to make it an even clock speed as the galaxy 2 & you can imagine the scores the extra 200mgz will give this phone. the screen is also comparable to the super amoled plus on the gs2 if you look at the google videos of bionic vs galaxy 2 youll see the viewing angles are just as good & the colors just as vivid but more accurate imo or the same to some, but with the benefit of the higher resolution screen. id say they are evenly matched but the motorola's gps,screen & cdma antennas are more superior in my eyes. check out the reviews & be your own judge. i was going to wait for the galaxy 2 on sprint but instead im going to buy the Photon which is the sprints version of the bionic but it has a kickstand & 1gig of ram instead of 512mb which would give it the advantage over the galazy s2. only problem is that they have the locked bootloader & ill have to deal with that until someone unlocks the device.
Unless the DX2 team worked on it 