Engadget Has a Full AT&T Review.

[slims1179]

I was just reading on Engadget the FULL AT&T review and some might be glad they held onto or bought the Older version of the Samsung Galaxy Note.

You can read all about it here:

AT&T Galaxy Note review -- Engadget

 

[colnago]

I'm sure most felt that the "slower" Exynos chip would outperform the Qualcomm, but not by as much as what was seen in the Engadget tests.

 

[bubbameat]

Will ICS help bridge the performance gap? At least at the user level and not benchmarks?

 

[cuseguy]

Anyone who has run a GSII Skyrocket is already familiar with the 1.5ghz Snapdragon with 1gb of ram and in real-life it performs more than adequately. I really have no beefs with the SR performance at all. It is quick and rarely lags. Do I wish the US version had Exynos? Of course, but until it plays nice with LTE, this is what we have. It's still faster than 90% of the high-end phones out there.

 

[Ryan Autry]

Anyone who has run a GSII Skyrocket is already familiar with the 1.5ghz Snapdragon with 1gb of ram and in real-life it performs more than adequately. I really have no beefs with the SR performance at all. It is quick and rarely lags. Do I wish the US version had Exynos? Of course, but until it plays nice with LTE, this is what we have. It's still faster than 90% of the high-end phones out there.

But the Snapdragon in the Skyrocket only has to deal with 800x480 resolution instead of the massive 1280x800 resoution in the Note.

Thats why the AT&T GSII @ 1.2GHz is faster than the Skyrocket.

 

[JunBringer]

I'm pretty excited that they gave it such a positive review. The comments are getting pretty nuts on there, it's hilarious.

 

[bubbameat]

I'm pretty excited that they gave it such a positive review. The comments are getting pretty nuts on there, it's hilarious.

I think most negative comments are from Iphone nutters, folks who have not handled at length, reviewers not thinking outside of the box, or reviewers with a "must be a small phone" chip on their shoulder.

IMHO The most objective I've seen is mobileburn's.

 

[NZtechfreak]

I think most negative comments are from Iphone nutters, folks who have not handled at length, reviewers not thinking outside of the box, or reviewers with a "must be a small phone" chip on their shoulder.

IMHO The most objective I've seen is mobileburn's.

Really? More objective than my review? *goes to take a look at mobileburns review*

 

[bubbameat]

Really? More objective than my review? *goes to take a look at mobileburns review*

I've not seen yours and I should have clarified that my comments include the ATT version of the Note.