Well as much as I can't stand Apple's strongarm tactics, they had to realize what a big deal that was. I'm not a tech journalist and just an enthusiast but jeez...trade secrets and purchase of stolen prototypes...that is hardly legal. And I thought Giz reached their low point when they decided to walk around shutting off people's displays at CES in 2008 because they got hold of a TV-B-Gone.
edit: and yeah, this should probably go in a general chat subforum. It's not related to Evo.
It was lost then someone got their hands on it contacted Gizmodo and they "purchased" it. Purchasing a stolen/lost item is the same as stealing it especially when you knew it was lost and not meant for anyone's eyes in the first place, then they wrote about it which makes it 10x worse. Apple has a pretty good case if they choose to charge.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.