in the car scenario, you find comfort in the knowledge that there are people who know how to fix it and the fact that some of them just drive by, doesn't matter because there are others
but if god just drives by, there's not another one that could potentially fix it
So there's only one god then? Some religions would disagree with that.
that's actually a really good metaphor, but the difference is that a child needs to do the chore themselves to learn, while the notion of a god declares omnipotence, which means god could have us learn without the learning process as we understand it
Would that not defeat free will though? The child does have the option to walk away and not tie their shoes at all. Do you really have free will if some deity blasts all knowledge into our heads and never gives us the opportunity to learn? And then there's still the question of whether it's best for us. There are times parents sit down and teach their children things and there are times the parent lets the kid figure it out themselves. Again, to the child this is frustrating and puzzling because they lack the understanding to fully grasp what is going on. If we define god (which some would argue we can't do in the first place) as a supernatural being who is omnipotent and omniscient among other things, then we can also suppose that we, as beings of limited power and knowledge, lack the understanding to fully grasp why he/she/it behaves as he does.
again, what separates superman from god is that superman is not omnipotent - he knows there may come a time when he's not around, while for a god that would not be an issue
Do we know this for sure about god? Heck, the Klingons got ticked at their gods behavior and killed them all.
if superman does exist and lives on krypton that doesn't make the world a better place in any way
similarly, whether god exists or not, the world is as it is and is no better or worse for it
It does if you believe that God does involve himself in the affairs of man. Whether this involvement is good or bad is another question.
i'd say proving that superman doesn't exist is just as difficult as proving god doesn't exist
I can prove that it is extremely unlikely that Superman exists.
a) we know of no other intelligent life in the universe.
b) if there is other intelligent life in the universe the chances that it exists at the same time as we do and is close enough to fly here through the vast distances of space and possesses the technology to do so and possesses the inclination to do so and chooses to do are all slim.
c) a being that somehow takes the radiation from a yellow sun and gains amazing powers from it but is powerless under a red sun is unlikely as the radiation from the two suns are not much different. There are differences, but minor ones. We could live under a red sun with few problems assuming the Earth's orbit was close enough to get the proper amount of heat.
d) assuming the above are true, it would be extremely unlikely that such a being could operate without being detected by anyone
So I can say that it is extremely unlikely that Superman exists. With god, the same cannot be said. By definition, god is a supernatural being. By that definition alone, any rationality or rational means of proving or disproving his existence fails as a supernatural being is not bound by natural laws or reason.