stewie1350
Member
im tryin to find the board.sholes.c to overclock the admire but its not in here if anybody can tell me if its a different file
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
im tryin to find the board.sholes.c to overclock the admire but its not in here if anybody can tell me if its a different file
im tryin to find the board.sholes.c to overclock the admire but its not in here if anybody can tell me if its a different file


the file that would need edited is the acpuclock.cThank u playfulgod![]()


You making a kernel

Yes im goin to test if at least i can get the admire to 910 to 920 lets see what happens![]()
Lol i wish you the best of luck my friend ... But did you know that req0 got it at 1ghz stable (thats a little motivation so you can push the phone to its limits)
Yea and the battery blew up he's lucky he didnt get burned
stable, prolly not w/i undervolting the pi55 out of it and then it wont have no better performance than it does @900Mhz.So its possible to get the admire running at 920 mh??
stable, prolly not w/i undervolting the pi55 out of it and then it wont have no better performance than it does @900Mhz.
this is what i did
/* 7x27 normal with CDMA-only modem - PLL0 and PLL1 swapped and pll2 @ 800 */
static struct clkctl_acpu_speed pll0_960_pll1_196_pll2_800[] = {
{ 0, 19200, ACPU_PLL_TCXO, 0, 0, 19200, 0, 0, 24576 },
{ 1, 98304, ACPU_PLL_1, 1, 1, 98304, 0, 3, 49152 },
{ 0, 120000, ACPU_PLL_0, 4, 7, 60000, 1, 3, 49152 },
{ 1, 196608, ACPU_PLL_1, 1, 0, 65536, 2, 4, 98304 },
{ 0, 200000, ACPU_PLL_2, 2, 3, 66667, 2, 4, 98304 },
{ 1, 320000, ACPU_PLL_0, 4, 2, 160000, 1, 5, 120000 },
{ 0, 400000, ACPU_PLL_2, 2, 1, 133333, 2, 5, 120000 },
{ 1, 480000, ACPU_PLL_0, 4, 1, 160000, 2, 6, 120000 },
{ 1, 800000, ACPU_PLL_2, 2, 0, 200000, 3, 7, 120000 },
{ 1, 850000, ACPU_PLL_0, 2, 1, 200000, 3, 8, 120000 },
{ 1, 900000, ACPU_PLL_2, 2, 2, 200000, 3, 9, 120000 },
{ 1, 910000, ACPU_PLL_0, 2, 3, 200000, 4, 0, 120000 },
{ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, {0, 0, 0}, {0, 0, 0} }
THE TOP ONE IS WRONG ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
THIS IS THE RIGHT ONE
/* 7x27 normal with CDMA-only modem - PLL0 and PLL1 swapped */
static struct clkctl_acpu_speed pll0_960_pll1_196_pll2_1200[] = {
{ 0, 19200, ACPU_PLL_TCXO, 0, 0, 19200, 0, 0, 24576 },
{ 1, 98304, ACPU_PLL_1, 1, 1, 98304, 0, 3, 49152 },
{ 0, 120000, ACPU_PLL_0, 4, 7, 60000, 1, 3, 49152 },
{ 1, 196608, ACPU_PLL_1, 1, 0, 65536, 2, 4, 98304 },
{ 0, 200000, ACPU_PLL_2, 2, 5, 66667, 2, 4, 98304 },
{ 1, 320000, ACPU_PLL_0, 4, 2, 160000, 1, 5, 120000 },
{ 0, 400000, ACPU_PLL_2, 2, 2, 133333, 2, 5, 120000 },
{ 1, 480000, ACPU_PLL_0, 4, 1, 160000, 2, 6, 120000 },
{ 1, 600000, ACPU_PLL_2, 2, 1, 200000, 2, 7, 120000 },
#ifdef CONFIG_MSM7X27_OVERCLOCK
{ 1, 800000, ACPU_PLL_0, 4, 0, 200000, 3, 7, 122880 },
{ 1, 852000, ACPU_PLL_0, 4, 0, 213000, 3, 7, 122880 },
{ 1, 880000, ACPU_PLL_0, 4, 0, 220000, 3, 7, 122880 },
{ 1, 900000, ACPU_PLL_0, 4, 0, 225000, 3, 7, 122880 },
{ 1, 910000, ACPU_PLL_0, 4, 0, 228000, 3, 7, 122880 },
#endif
{ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, {0, 0, 0}, {0, 0, 0} }
the bold #'s, but like I said all you're going to accomplish is a faster cpufreq # and no performance gains.Where can i find the pi55
the bold #'s, but like I said all you're going to accomplish is a faster cpufreq # and no performance gains.