Root MIKG3.11 stock v anthrax?

[mikem0269]

I was wondering what advantage anthrax had over the stock kernel on mikg? any disadvantages with it?
As always thanks for all replies

 

[MizzouBrent]

Faster plus audio tweaks. Maybe slightly worse battery

 

[ocnbrze]

just remember that with kernels it is always YRMV. what works for you may or may not work for me. my phone did ok with anthrax. i had the best battery life on cm7 with the latest tiamat kernel. no other rom/kernel combo came close.

 

[Mikestony]

I ran both of Chad's Anthrax kernels on MikG and they were both better than the stock kernel. However, as ocn said, your results may vary and I did not notice a difference running either Anthrax kernel. On my phone, the REV_004 version ran a little better--(less random reboots)
Directory listing for www.androidfilehost.com/main/EVO_4G_Developers/Chad.Goodman/KERNELS/

Edit: fwiw, he recommends wiping cache and dalvik cache twice...once before flashing and again after flashing..

 

[MizzouBrent]

I ran both of Chad's Anthrax kernels on MikG and they were both better than the stock kernel. However, as ocn said, your results may vary and I did not notice a difference running either Anthrax kernel. On my phone, the REV_004 version ran a little better--(less random reboots)
Directory listing for www.androidfilehost.com/main/EVO_4G_Developers/Chad.Goodman/KERNELS/

Edit: fwiw, he recommends wiping cache and dalvik cache twice...once before flashing and again after flashing..

And my phone was the exact opposite...random reboots on build 4 and near flawless on build 9

 

[Mikestony]

^^^proof that your results may vary....
Just try it out but give a kernel 3 or 4 days before you condemn or condone it.

 

[mikem0269]

I was mainly concerned with battery. The stock kernel is doing quite well.
no random reboots and all works well. Thanks for the info.