Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No not necessarily. People who think that care for the uninsured (and those illegals the repubs are all hot about) doesn't get paid for someway somehow are the ones that don't get it. I certainly don't think you can reason with terrorists.People that think universal healthcare is a good system or free are the same people that think they can reason with terrorists.
You don't get it. Health care costs money (so do wars). It gets paid for somewhere/how, and that is going to be from those that has. Glad you feel so "privileged" as to not care for the unfortunates. If that's the case, go to your tea party and demand that we legislate health care such that it is only provided to those with insurance/cash. You can't make the health care system provide by edict, yet refuse to pay for the resulting unreimbursed cost....How much of your monthly pay check comes out for NHS? Out of mine I pay my own health insurance, and Medicare/Medicade (socialist plot to keep the 'unfortunate' voting for the democrat party...)
He just don't get it, and neither do you.
BTW, you know that Iraq war? It cost almost exactly as much as that bail-out did at the time it was funded ($700+ billion). I don't recall that comparison ever being made and yet the bail-out is all that gets the attention from the right wing.Health care costs money (so do wars).
"Estimate" is the key word there. No government program ever comes in anywhere close to the "estimate". Democrats are playing with the numbers by collecting taxes beginning immediately for a program that won't begin until 2013, conveniently after the next presidential election (I wonder why...). Which brings up another question: If it is so imperative to give "healthcare to everyone", why will it take another 3 years minimum? I thought people were dying every day due to lack of insurance? Sure seems like the party in charge doesn't care much about them, huh?BTW, you know that Iraq war? It cost almost exactly as much as that bail-out did at the time it was funded ($700+ billion). I don't recall that comparison ever being made and yet the bail-out is all that gets the attention from the right wing.
Oh, and the estimate on the health care plan for the next 10 years is in the neighborhood of the Iraq war's cost. Just think, we could have funded health care AND the bail-out, and if we'd never bothered with Iraq have broken even......,
I'll take drugs in place of terrorism any day when it comes to exports from the middle east.I'm happy that I don't live in america. Okay germany is not the best choice either but at least there are few people here who believe in this "our country is the chosen country, we have to bring our capitalistic democracy to everyone"-bullshit. Obama isn't that good and he won't change the US for what they are, but he is sure as hell better then those apes that were leading the country before...
And tbh everyone who thinks the iraq or afghanistan war is justified, should think about that after reading the statistics about the uprising of warlords, heroin smuggling and so on since we(USA, NATO,...) are occupying those countries.
What is your definition of "the unfortunates"? If you say "disabled", I'm with you. But I have a feeling you're talking about everyone without health insurance which would include illegals and those too lazy to provide for themselves while leeching off of the rest of us. I'm not with you there.You don't get it. Health care costs money (so do wars). It gets paid for somewhere/how, and that is going to be from those that has. Glad you feel so "privileged" as to not care for the unfortunates. If that's the case, go to your tea party and demand that we legislate health care such that it is only provided to those with insurance/cash. You can't make the health care system provide by edict, yet refuse to pay for the resulting unreimbursed cost....
germany speaking here. The tax rate is fine, but imo it could be higher in the rich class Still you earn more than enough!The cost of government run healthcare will also overrun the middle class with taxes. Don't believe me? Check the tax rates in the nations that have socialized medicine.
Reading your policy would mean you know what you are covered for in the event of that bike wreck or other unforeseen circumstance. Do you think you deserve to be covered for flood insurance on your home if you didn't pay for it and never bothered to read your policy in advance? How about a car you own and you chose not to pay for comprehensive/collision and you total it? Should I or anyone else pay your bills then because you chose not to cover yourself?By "your" problem" I meant it will at some point come home to YOUR roost, not that you have to fix it FOR HIM. You may be right about reading your policy, but it is in those policies you will find what is NOT covered. Those claims are, again, the ones that will murder you're budget. Do you know an outpatient Knee 'scope costs above $6000? That may be routinely covered, but what about the real stuff, an open heart operation at $40,000 or more, a stroke with rehab at double that.
Tort reform is important, and I wish there was much in the plan about that. But coverage is MORE important so I have set my priorities accordingly.
2 questions: How old are you/your family, and what claims are we referring to in your case? My bike wreck resulted in a $160,000 bill for a week's stay WITHOUT having any surgery. I was "young" and healthy at the time (2002). I trust, and hope, your kids claims were for a broken wrist at worst and not leukemia, where you might exceed your limit BEFORE the marrow transplant.......
Who are you to determine who earns "more than enough"?germany speaking here. The tax rate is fine, but imo it could be higher in the rich class Still you earn more than enough!
Let me try again: Health care is provided to EVERYONE, insured or not. It can NOT be refused. Society is ALREADY paying for it. If it's not figured in your taxes right now, it IS being figured in your personal health care costs.
I'd rather set it up so that everyone gets treatment as they currently do, but any individual struck with a catastrophic illnesss, and heaven forbid, ASSETS (meaning stuff for "them" to go after when you can't pay your bills anymore). Because your life will be ruined. Oh, I guess it's OK because then you can go to any ER and get care. You might be living in your car but can take solace i n the fact that you, being "unfortunate", are now being paid for by those working stiffs......
What is your definition of "the unfortunates"? If you say "disabled", I'm with you. But I have a feeling you're talking about everyone without health insurance which would include illegals and those too lazy to provide for themselves while leeching off of the rest of us. I'm not with you there.
No not necessarily. People who think that care for the uninsured (and those illegals the repubs are all hot about) doesn't get paid for someway somehow are the ones that don't get it. I certainly don't think you can reason with terrorists.
The point is the cost of care is getting covered somehow, and an important place is YOUR health insurance dollars. IF we refused to treat those people without insurance your argument would be sound. But we don't. They get care whether or not they pay for it. Eliminating the ability of companies to deny coverage AND finding a way to REIMBURSE the system for the care of the currently uninsured does what insurance should: It spreads the costs accross the many.
Those folks care is only covered - i.e. forced on us all - by GOVERNMENT MANDATES.
If hospitals were allowed to check for citizenship and / or ability to pay *(i.e. run like any other business)*, health costs in this country would drop like a stone. People (thanks government schools...) go to the emergency room for a cold!
I say "emergency care only". If you're hurt, and you can't pay, fine - we fix you up... but if you're here illegally, we also put you back where you belong....
Every "Poor person" is already covered by medicaid... so get rid of the illegals, enact tort reform, and (oh my!) teach people to be responsible for their decisions (i.e. if you do CRACK, it's not my responsibilty to pay for your health care...), and we'd be in great shape.
John
You don't have a RIGHT to health care if you can't pay for it yourself, any more than you have a right to a Plasma TV you can't afford.You don't get it. Health care costs money (so do wars). It gets paid for somewhere/how, and that is going to be from those that has. Glad you feel so "privileged" as to not care for the unfortunates. If that's the case, go to your tea party and demand that we legislate health care such that it is only provided to those with insurance/cash. You can't make the health care system provide by edict, yet refuse to pay for the resulting unreimbursed cost....
I don't understand that you pay a premium and you still have to fork out $2000.
A right by definition DOES NOT take from or infringe on any other person. Taking my money to pay your doctor bill because you spent all your money on a Prada purse, well, that's either THEFT or imposed slavery.
let's hear it for the nexus one!
Let's hear it for the Nexus One!