Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The pixel size of the GS4 is 1.12 I believe. So if that 1.4 is true, that's awesome. Although I couldn't find anything, so could you send me a link to the Sony IMX179 pixel size?
Also, do we know the aperture size of the Nexus 5?
Anyone else really bummed about the battery size?
If previous Nexus devices lacked anything, it was battery life. Disappointed they couldn't fit the size of the G2's in it.
Could it have bigger? Perhaps. But I think everyone is going to be surprised at how long it will last given the efficiency of the chipset. The Nexus 4 had the same battery capacity as the extended gnex battery and last twice as long. This is going to be a bigger battery with an even more efficient chipset ago I'm expecting 6 hours of screen time.
The screen is the biggest power hog of a phone, not the CPU. And now this phone has more pixels to push and a larger screen area to backlight.
I've grown tired of my S4 and was really thinking about getting the Moto X.... Until I remembered that the Nexus 5 would should / would be a better choice for so many reasons... No extended contract, quicker updates... etc... I just wish we had a solid release date.... It should be this month, right?
While this is true in most cases, in others it's the data radio. First generation LTE radios were so bad for the battery that most people didn't even use them. Even still, something has to work to push all those pixels to the screen and that would be the more efficient chipset, more specifically the Adreno 330 GPU. If the GPU isn't efficient, it doesn't matter how big the screen is.
Nexus 4 vs Nexus 5 specs
Nexus 5 vs. Nexus 4 [Specs]
Nexus 4 vs Nexus 5 specs
Nexus 5 vs. Nexus 4 [Specs]
Did anyone see anything if the N5 has gram like the G2?
Alright, so will this work with Metro PCS?
But that doesn't change the fact that the screen is still the biggest battery hog.
Agreed. They should have replicated the G2's battery @3000 mAh. Why not? What reason could there possibly be to reduce the battery size when we are talking similar size phones by the same manufacturer released months apart? Makes no sense at all to me. I don't understand why they always seem to downsize the batteries in the Nexus line. Only reason I can come up with is that they run a leaner OS and I don't think that reasoning is sound. That should be an ADVANTAGE in battery savings not a tradeoff to allow a lesser battery.
Now granted, I do think the N5 will see similar up time as the G2...which is impressive. But I think it'll see less screen on time. And that's the only thing that kills my G2. When I'm using regular...1-2 days depending on activity level. When I'm gaming a lot...10-12 hours.
2 reasons, cost and size.
Google wants to keep the cost down, and the battery is a way to help.
The Nexus 5 looks to have small bezels, which is awesome. But it has small bezels with a 4.95" screen and the G2 has small bezels with a 5.2" screen. So the G2 might be bigger. Plus I believe the G2 is curved on the back. This gives more volume to add a bigger battery. And LG created a stepped battery to fill in the curved area better. The Nexus 5 does not look to be curved at all. Plus again, a stepped battery will likely bring price up.
By $300 or so? Admittedly guessing on the retail cost difference of the phones but if history serves that could be in the ballpark ($350 vs $650). I don't think the difference in form factor from a G2 to a N5 makes much difference in production cost but who knows. I do agree with you about the size, there is a difference worth noting. I can understand a discrepancy there. Just didn't figure the mAh loss would be that great. Anyway, hopefully it'll work out to be a good blend of battery life to cost of phone for you guys. But after owning multiple Android phones with inferior batteries, it's become high on my list of needs.
By $300 or so? Admittedly guessing on the retail cost difference of the phones but if history serves that could be in the ballpark ($350 vs $650). I don't think the difference in form factor from a G2 to a N5 makes much difference in production cost but who knows. I do agree with you about the size, there is a difference worth noting. I can understand a discrepancy there. Just didn't figure the mAh loss would be that great. Anyway, hopefully it'll work out to be a good blend of battery life to cost of phone for you guys. But after owning multiple Android phones with inferior batteries, it's become high on my list of needs.