• After 15+ years, we've made a big change: Android Forums is now Early Bird Club. Learn more here.

Root Quadrant - What's your score?

selvikin

selvikin

Member
Mine was 399 yesterday. Just to give you an info of what I'm running:

ROM: Kaos Froyo v31 with ADW Launcher (No Window Animations)
Performance tweaks enabled: Compcache, JIT, Surface Dithering, VM Heap Size: 24M.
SetCPU Not Installed

Curious to see if others checked their scores, and what the normal ballpark figure is (mine ranked higher than the stock Moto Droid, so made my day! :D )
 
Mine is 425
Rom: Kaos froyo v31 with LauncherPro(free) also no window animations
Performance tweaks enabled: JIT, DISABLED Surface Dithering, VM heap:24, NO compcache
Setcpu installed: 748/604 main, profiles set: screen off 480/160; Battery>30% 528/245

Pondering Underclocking to 528/245..sure benchmarks may be fubared but if real system performance is good...that matters most :)
 
On xtrROM 4.0.6. My benchmarks are much lower than you guys with froyo going. Although, I've tried both ROMs, and despite Quadrant scores, xtrROM runs much smoother than any froyo I've tried.
 
Kaos v30 - JIT on, Launcher Pro, standard tweaks - 420ish IIRC
xtrROM 4.0.6.1 - JIT on, Launcher Pro - 281

I find benchmark results amusing since xtr is quite a bit faster for me in actual usage.
 
414 on nonsensikal 4.6
768/480 and running live wallpapers.

This is a pretty cool app, I like the comparison it does at the end of the test.
Now have you run Linpack for Android? My phone seems to be real slow on that test.
 
ExcessiveIdling said:
Mine is 425
Rom: Kaos froyo v31 with LauncherPro(free) also no window animations
Performance tweaks enabled: JIT, DISABLED Surface Dithering, VM heap:24, NO compcache
Setcpu installed: 748/604 main, profiles set: screen off 480/160; Battery>30% 528/245
Click to expand...

Hmm.. I got 396 and I have pretty much the same set up as you. So I rebooted the phone and now I get 378.. Oh well, as long as it runs well.. which it is..
 
Reran with same perf. tweaks but now main is 748/19 and screen off 528/19 I know peeps on xda have been messin with the 19 setting...Anyone notice any problems running that low? Like lack of notification retrieval? Curious. Trying using setcpu for a bit to see if I do indeed get better battery life. Still think don't NEED to oc though.
 
selvikin said:
Mine was 399 yesterday. Just to give you an info of what I'm running:

ROM: Kaos Froyo v31 with ADW Launcher (No Window Animations)
Performance tweaks enabled: Compcache, JIT, Surface Dithering, VM Heap Size: 24M.
SetCPU Not Installed

Curious to see if others checked their scores, and what the normal ballpark figure is (mine ranked higher than the stock Moto Droid, so made my day! :D )
Click to expand...

Using the same settings above (with the exception of launcher pro in place of adw) I hit 4.53 on KaosFroyo v31.
 
Nonsensikal, not SetCPU tweeks, and I got a 399 on the first run. One "notch" above the Droid
 
KaosFroyo V31 here. LP+, JIT/Virtual Heap 32/Compache/Surface Dithering/Fast animations and transitions/OCed to 768/480 Performance =

353.

The first time. Disappointed with these results, I went to Autokiller, killed a bunch of things that didn't need to be on at the time, switched back over to Quadrant and got -

421.
 
Im using kaosFroyo v31 getting over 4 with no JIT OC speeds at 787.
JIT is horrible in my opinion it lagged my phone so much couldnt even do anything on it dont know why people like it better i think it just slows the phone down tremendously
 
Quad - 458

Linpack - 5.008 mflops

Kaos Froyo v34 - Launcher Pro - Set cpu and Autokiller (optimal) - Launcher Pro set to one screen and some animations.
 
KaosFroyo v34 with CFS kernel clocked to at 768/245 (my normal settings). With the BFS kernel, the stock v34 kernel, I was getting a Quadrant score high of 472 (averaging 460s) and MLFLOPS of 5.4 but since it causes scrolling and gps issues for some and Kaos is going back to CFS, I just decided to flash it even though I really had no problem with the BFS.

Also for kicks I tested two stock 2.1 all apps killed and got Quardrant best of 205 for both phones. And obviously these numbers dont directly corelate with speed. I've ran my phone right next to phones running 7x my scores with little difference in speed opening apps and typical functions ect.


screenshot_13.jpg





screenshot_14.jpg
 
Not to cross-contaminate (and in no way bragging, there's a lot I hate about this phone) but my Samsung Captivate got a 871. Funny part is it's rating it above "Samsung Galaxy S".

I'm really hoping the Froyo+GPS update fixes this phone so I can finally start enjoying it instead of working with and against it's many many flaws...
 
Jofaba said:
Not to cross-contaminate (and in no way bragging, there's a lot I hate about this phone) but my Samsung Captivate got a 871. Funny part is it's rating it above "Samsung Galaxy S".

I'm really hoping the Froyo+GPS update fixes this phone so I can finally start enjoying it instead of working with and against it's many many flaws...
Click to expand...

Rooted , lag fixed and overclocked Galaxy S are hitting 2300+ , kinda of a diffrent animal compared to an Eris, my Incredible has hit 1817 at 1.113ghz
 
Rooted Eris running Aloysius Snow - I haven't tweaked any settings at all (no overclocking other than whatever the ROM does on its own) and I got a 224 the first time through Quadrant. Not great. However, the phone is running much much better than it did before I rooted! And, while my battery has been sinking fast the last couple of days, I JUST NOW noticed that the GPS was turned on. So I've turned it off and expect much better battery performance now (it had improved considerably after rooting). I plan to reboot, recharge, and retry Quadrant. We'll see.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom