I use Epson scanners. I've had one for years. I like the fact that Epson doesn't make comments like an HP scanjet we had in the office. It would refuse to scan at 300dpi. I don't care for HP anyway. The Canon Lidoscans also won't work. I have a couple on machines where I am not scanning photographs.
I've never had any issues AT ALL scanning at 300dpi--or higher.
The Epson has 2 files, and you have to install them in order, to boot.
I can't speak to that since I have no personal experience with it. But I do want to say that this
could be a misunderstanding of how things work on Linux. The best analogy I can think of right now is how peripherals, such as printers, typically come with a CD for window$ and their instructions always say to go through the installation process using the CD, blah blah blah. Well, those CDs are
completely unnecessary in Linux. And I mean the files on them, such as drivers. They're unnecessary because Linux recognizes the peripheral and configures everything itself, with no need for the user to ever crack open the CD. Sure, you have to choose from a list of printers to select your brand and model, but that's about it. The OS does the rest. I do remember when I'd have to look online for certain HP files, but those days are long gone. (And the list of printer brands/models is HUGE, and definitely not limited to HP.)
If Linux wants to appeal to the masses, it had better not assume that everyone wants the same printers, scanners, what have you.
It doesn't. I don't really know where that idea came from.
Yes, because it does everything I need, and then some.
but a lot of Photoshop users control their prints via PS. You can calibrate your printer, monitor, and paper so you are exactly WYSIWYG on print. (Mine is) Most prefer the Epson line of printers, or they did. Some like dye sub. Same for scanners. Some others like the Brother line. These people won't switch to Linux
Again, perhaps that's due to misconceptions/misunderstandings and/or lack of knowledge.
I still have an old IBM impact printer and an LPT1 port that I made the tech leave. What would Linux do with that?
Is this a trick question? :hmmmm2: Unlike window$, Linux can--and does--support ANCIENT hardware.
RE: TAR.**
I know that those are zipped formats. Ubuntu won't deal with them
I seriously don't know what you mean. ANY Linux distro will 'deal with' tar files.
tar is as old as UNIX itself. Now, if you say you don't know HOW to make Ubuntu deal with them, that's one thing, but Ubuntu itself most definitely does handle them. At its most fundamental level, the command line,
tar is a built-in feature of every *nix I've ever heard of.
and I still need to see the actual written example of how to get it to work via root.
Again, I don't know what you mean. A tar file doesn't need root. It doesn't even need a command prompt. Just right-click it in your file manager [I use Dolphin] and pick the choice(s) you want, such as "Extract archive here, auto-detect subfolders" so it'll extract it and correctly recreate its subdirectory structure. This has nothing to do with root. It also has nothing to do with installing whatever's inside the tarball. Extracting it is one thing, installing its contents is another--and, frankly, it kind of sounds like you're confusing the two, or thinking they're the same thing.
I need to read the stuff to figure it out.
Well, there's TONS of reading available online!
But, look, if you've downloaded something and don't know what to do with it, just post here and ask for help.
Ubuntu 12.04 would not let me install like 11.10 did. I had all this stuff on 11.10.
I don't know. :dontknow:
Skype sound would not work on Mint. I use Skype as the main way to talk to kid in the UK.
Skype didn't exist when my kid lived in the UK. I wish it had! Anyway, as I've mentioned, it runs fine on all my Kubuntus.
Never heard of Alien. Will have to investigate.
Just go to a prompt and type
man alien for its manual pages.
What's really annoying me about the zipped files in Ubuntu, unlike Windows, the ESR files came from Mozilla, not some ripoff download site. If you can include the FX browser, then you should trust Moz.
Again, this is NOT a *buntu problem. I'm sorry but...it's a user problem.
Any Linux can handle tar files, and none of them, including Ubuntu, should care where the files came from or what's in them. If you, the user, wish to extract a tarball, there's nothing stopping you from doing so. At least nothing I've ever encountered.
Now, if you're talking about the CONTENTS of the zipped files, as opposed to the zipped files themselves, you may run into problems [as Nick has, but I have not] with trying to install something not intended for your computer's architecture. But that's not a problem with the files.
If the reasonable stuff will install on Kubuntu, I will switch. I don't need much on there.
I'd strongly suggest posting questions/issues either here or elsewhere, such as on Ubuntu/Kubuntu specific sites. There's so much help available out there!