Gmash
Extreme Android User
In case some people don't read Phandroid:
Former Sun CEO: Google didn’t need licenses to use Java APIs for Android
Former Sun CEO: Google didn’t need licenses to use Java APIs for Android
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The trial is pretty fascinating.
Lots of news coming out.
E.G. Number of Tablets sold, Revenues. I was totally surprise that iOS ad revenues pretty much funds Android's development. It is staggeringly off vis-a-vis the touted 850,000 daily android activations. You figure Android would bring in more money since it has an app-store and the google play (music/books/movies). Yet, iOS ad revenues in just web ads is staggering.
Kindle fire does nothing for Google since Amazon's silk browser strips and blocks google ads.
First Android revenue numbers revealed: $278.1m in 2010, iPhone more lucrative | The Verge
... Google expected the delta to widen; the company forecast making $840.2m from Android mobile ads in 2012 vs just $35.9m on apps sales.
"How you like them apples? "
Oracle loses on patent infrigement.
Now the trial needs to continue on the copyright infringement.
Over 9 - count 'em - 9 lines of source code.
http://androidforums.com/lounge/433877-end-android.html
Oracle started out suing Google for US$6.1 billion (with a b - billion) while crying a river in the media.
It seems that early reports of Android's demise were greatly exaggerated.
Google is going to owe Oracle how much, exactly, for 9 lines of code?
Hey Larry (ceo of Oracle) - didja have fun? Was it all worth it?
How'd that work out for ya, huh?
Over 9 - count 'em - 9 lines of source code.[/I]
Tip of the topper to IOWA for passing along this news -
Ouch - Judge orders Oracle to reimburse Google's legal expensesAndroidGuys
Please let me translate into simply legal terms -
AH HAHAHAAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAAHAAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAAHAAHA
Ok, I couldn't resist. Seriously though -
AH HAHAHAAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAAHAAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAAHAAHA
HAHAHAAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAAHAAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAAHAAHA
HAHAHAAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAAHAAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAAHAAHA
i did not read the court briefings...
but some of the comments there.. say that the article is miss-leading.
Oracle does have to pay.. but not for what the article says or that much.
for making google doing some study 3 times.. or for not doing something the court ordered them to do.. not sure.