• After 15+ years, we've made a big change: Android Forums is now Early Bird Club. Learn more here.

Root [UPDATED] 4/16 Post your AnTuTu Benchmark for CTMod, CM7 and 187-MoD.

AnTuTu CPU Master Pro CTMod 3.5 Theme--GreenMe.
Max-925
Min-200
I/O-sio
Gov-Lagfree

screenshot-1334395212499.png
 
Slayer72 said:
Well at least I know who it was that got my thread merged to this one now, and just for your information wetbiker's thread DID NOT specify CTMod 3.5, just CTMod, so I was justified in creating my own thread, but apparently the moderator thought otherwise, oh well, have fun guys...

Next time check thread titles...
Click to expand...
Don't get all butthurt man, this thread covers exactly what you intended with your thread. Don't need people posting the same thing in numerous threads. I think the mod that merged them is indirectly telling you to take your own advice, "Next time check thread titles".

I'm just running stock, no overclock. I was getting too many freezes and random reboots when I was overclocking. This is about what I consistantly benchmark at as stock CTMod 3.5.
screenshot-1334456022823.png
 
BirdWithBowtie said:
Sorry for attachment - how do I embed the pic as others have done?

Voltage control
Max-946
Min-200
I/O-sio
Gov-performance
Click to expand...


Have found 2 ways to post pics... Go to your profile upload photos to your image folder then image link it or use BB code. Or use something like photobucket. Link it the same way. I use my phone a lot and photobucket has a mobile app too.
 
Slayer72 said:
Well at least I know who it was that got my thread merged to this one now, and just for your information wetbiker's thread DID NOT specify CTMod 3.5, just CTMod, so I was justified in creating my own thread, but apparently the moderator thought otherwise, oh well, have fun guys...

Next time check thread titles...
Click to expand...


It's all good man, don't sweat it. The the reason I didn't put a specific version in my thread title was that A lot of other versions of CTMod are being ran and I knew that there were more to come. I just read a post from a member who was still running 3.2. There are probably people running older versions too.

This thread was meant for all versions of CTMod. Don't get upset at the mods Bro, they were doing their job. Someone probably reported it too.;):)
 
Slayer72 said:
I just love how people suggest that I should read thread titles before I make a post when I already did, seems to me that they have nothing better to do than to nitpick people's threads that they've created, like I said I was fully justified for creating the thread that I created, not my problem if they think that there's a problem with it, my point still remains...

On a better note, thanks to everyone that has posted their information here in yours and my thread... :)
Click to expand...

No doubt Bro. It didn't bother me man. That's the reason I really didn't say anything.

One thread just makes it sooo much easier for newbies or people that have questions about their settings.:D
 
Slayer72 said:
Well at least I know who it was that got my thread merged to this one now, and just for your information wetbiker's thread DID NOT specify CTMod 3.5, just CTMod, so I was justified in creating my own thread, but apparently the moderator thought otherwise, oh well, have fun guys...

Next time check thread titles...
Click to expand...


First ALL I said was that there were similar threads with similar information. I never once insulted you nor did I mention anything that would be considered negative in my post. I'm not exactly sure how you could have possibly misread my post. You however took things WAY too personally. I'm sorry you feel that way. If you have some negativity to me because of this, that's fine. I on the other hand have none towards you, and that's a fact.

This is after all of a community of friends. I've never once insulted anyone nor given anyone any reason to. I always felt that I was very respectful of everyone here and give that in return.
 
Roguefoxx said:
CPU Frequency with CTMod seems to always report that no matter what it's set to. Probably has to do with Koumakernel 2.4 and the way it's reported. It has always reported 946 no matter what for me.
Click to expand...

I've made a couple of posts regarding this. The only time I've had it read differently was when its set to 925. Please look at some of my shots and you'll see.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom