• After 15+ years, we've made a big change: Android Forums is now Early Bird Club. Learn more here.

what is sooo good about sprint anyway?

it is a natural tech progression... i think everyone will have one.. sometime in the near future.

eventually it will be just a cheap to make a low-level smartphone as it is to make a dumb phone.

plain phones will disappear.

Oh, I don't know about that. Take my mother, for instance. She blocks texting on her "dumb phone." She thinks texting is useless and annoying. She thinks that smart phones are too small to be useful for her for surfing the Internet.

She loves her iPad. She uses it for Internet surfing and for reading books, mainly.

I don't see her getting a smart phone anytime soon. She will fight it tooth and nail. For her a phone is a phone. It's not a toy or a computer.

I assume that there will continue to be many people who think like her for the time being and long into the future.
 
Oh, I don't know about that. Take my mother, for instance. She blocks texting on her "dumb phone." She thinks texting is useless and annoying. She thinks that smart phones are too small to be useful for her for surfing the Internet.

She loves her iPad. She uses it for Internet surfing and for reading books, mainly.

I don't see her getting a smart phone anytime soon. She will fight it tooth and nail. For her a phone is a phone. It's not a toy or a computer.

I assume that there will continue to be many people who think like her for the time being and long into the future.

Once my generation (Gen X) gets to be senior citizen age, that's when I think majority of people will be on Smartphones. That's still 30 years away, so I think

Only thing that could add to a faster integration to smartphones are inventions like this one...

Meet the PhoneEasy 740, the world's simplest Android phone!

The Baby Boomer Generation is the fastest growing generation using smartphones, but that definitely doesn't mean all of them are enjoying it.
 
but once it cost the same to make a dumb phone or a low-level smartphone. it will be within 5 yrs. why would manufactures make dumb phones???

eventually.. there will be no NEW dumb phones being made.
 
Because having a "smart"phone on a wireless network costs twice as much, or more, than a non-"smart"phone?


Then I guess we won't have wireless at all. We are not going to pay $120-$150/mo. for wireless service. Period.

You read that right: "Not." Up until now it was "Maybe..." Now it's "not."

This thread actually encouraged me to stay away from wireless data entirely. Some might say, or at least think "You don't know what you're missing." Yeah, I do. And, no offense, but I see what becoming addicted to it has done to peoples' sense.

No thanks.

I'll hang around for rebuttals, flames, expressions of injured dignity, etc. ;), then I'll be taking my leave. At this point I don't think I'll have anything further to contribute to any of the "smart"phone forums, as I'll not be partaking.

Jim

I think there are carriers that will let you activate a smartphone without data... I think it was TMOBILE.

So. What is your issue with smartphones??
 
You can't point to one exception to the rule and then totally disregard peoples concerns
I think there are carriers that will let you activate a smartphone without data... I think it was TMOBILE.

So. What is your issue with smartphones??

I could honestly do without a data plan. A WiFi only smart phone that hap a cheap monthly payment because it didn't use carrier data would be just fine.

Granted, that's not the same wants as the user quoted, but to each his own
 
Issues. Plural.

They're expensive. They're fragile. They require overly expensive data plans. No local sync or desktop apps. Poorly-integrated apps. Poor battery life. Poor reliability. Questionable software quality/security.

That's all I can think of, off hand...

Oh, yeah... These things have unsubsidized prices in the hundreds-of-dollars range. How many other things can you buy that cost that much and are considered technologically obsolete within a year or two... or less?

Jim
LOL I beg to differ.

Having suffered through old style PDAs and phones like the Palm Treo / Centro, having local backups / data that were a pain in the rear to sync, and use, there is no way I'd go back.

Smart phones *can* be fragile, but you can use otterbox to keep them protected, or buy ruggedized phones to begin with. Some of them do require expensive data plans, but not all. T-mobile being a prime example where you can take a smartphone and just use calling plans with it. Apps are fairly well integrated, not sure how you measure that...in many cases they are superior to PC based software.

Battery life do need to improve, but my S3 can go 2 days without charging, and that's with medium use. That's pretty impressive considering what I use it for. Reliability has been outstanding with my Samsung S2 / S3. Security is also far better than PCs.

So many of these perceptions really aren't reality, and you could apply them to any technology, such as tablets, laptops, or even home networks.

Once you do go smartphone, and provided you have the desire to learn new technology, it is life changing. I know of no one who switched to a smartphone, used it for a month or so, and went back to a dumb phone. None.

But if you're happy with where you're at, that's fine too. You are just missing out on some killer services that many others find useful, but like they say - you don't know what you're missing until you've had it.

For me, some basic things I take for granted now are reading product reviews while out shopping for things, price comparisons, finding the closest store for a particular need, finding the hours of the store, all things I used to have to call up a family member who's at home - asking them to fire up the PC, and do those things remotely for me, which was a pain in the rear.

Smartphones provide a new level of self sufficiency that is simply amazing, but of course can be misused / abused as well. I hardly text, but I do a lot of video chat with family when I'm traveling for work, plus GPS navigation for hotels / restaurants, and many many other cool things.
 
Ditto SEMIjim. Enjoy your non-smartphone.

I have one friend left who refuses to get a smartphone as well. He was the last person I knew to get a cellphone as well. He's a little strange, lacks some social skills (doesn't have many friends), but he seems happy enough to be going to bars all the time to watch football and drink beers. He tried a "feature phone" thinking it was a smart phone, LOL, for about a day and returned it, complaining he couldn't just flip open his phone and answer a call.

Funny enough CNN just hard an article today about "In Defense of My Stupid Phone"... funny article.

Smart phones, at the end of the day, are just another tool to help people organize / manage their lives. Great tools, but obviously not for everyone.
 
I wouldn't mind a slight increase in pricing, but that is only if SoftBank is able to hasten Network Vision.

I agree, but it depends on how "slight" that increase would be, on a per customer basis. Ultimately, if Softbank's pockets can allow for Sprint a more rapid development on Network Vision, the rewards could be great for both Sprint customers and Sprint. Only time will tell.
 
I agree, but it depends on how "slight" that increase would be, on a per customer basis. Ultimately, if Softbank's pockets can allow for Sprint a more rapid development on Network Vision, the rewards could be great for both Sprint customers and Sprint. Only time will tell.

I was thinking something like $5-10 (maximum) USD per plan.
 
I'd be ok with that, if it meant that SoftBank's bankroll would push out Sprint's Network Vision faster (and hopefully, even expand further than what Sprint originally projected).

Theoretically, there's no reason to think why that couldn't occur. I would assume they would make a serious run at MetroPCS at that time too since they'll have additional backing financially.

I just wouldn't want any structural changes to Sprint outside of SoftBank becoming a majority stakeholder. None of their execs should be coming over here unless it's just to oversee finances.
 
Sprint/Softbank just bought a majority stake in Clearwire and since Metro is CDMA as well I would think it would be a good fit for Softbank to buy them as well.

I believe Metro also has LTE as well.
 
Because having a "smart"phone on a wireless network costs twice as much, or more, than a non-"smart"phone?


Then I guess we won't have wireless at all. We are not going to pay $120-$150/mo. for wireless service. Period.

You read that right: "Not." Up until now it was "Maybe..." Now it's "not."

This thread actually encouraged me to stay away from wireless data entirely. Some might say, or at least think "You don't know what you're missing." Yeah, I do. And, no offense, but I see what becoming addicted to it has done to peoples' sense.

No thanks.

I'll hang around for rebuttals, flames, expressions of injured dignity, etc. ;), then I'll be taking my leave. At this point I don't think I'll have anything further to contribute to any of the "smart"phone forums, as I'll not be partaking.

Jim

When I saw that my Vietnam vet grandad maybe wants a smartphone that's why I think dumb phones are gonna be obsolete
 
Back
Top Bottom