Berry2Droid
Android Enthusiast
I get what your saying, and in most cases i agree with the consumer tbh. In this case I agree with you. But think about it like this. The system sends the phone to be shipped, then checks if it was activated. So thats why it must be. So for instance, say the system doesnt check. and we ship phones, and they never get activated, and sold to someone on ebay or whatever. Now the customer is like, hey I never got my phone..you guys owe me another phone, meanwhile, they are the ones who sold it. If the phone is activated on the number, then you know they got it and activated it ect..This isnt the exact thing ur saying, but thaats 1 reason this is implemented. The old restocking fee rules were:Umm...I'm not meaning to shoot the messenger here. I know you're only stating their policy and you do not make said policy.
With that said, that is utterly rediculous. They force you to activate a phone you know you don't want so they can then render it useless to others without a further chain of custody required. Then they charge a needless restocking fee that could have been avoided by taking the phone back. Here's a thought...if they get the phone back, unopened and it it's original packaging, it wasn't sold.
Again, not trying to give YOU a hard time but that seems effin crazy to me. I guess that's why I go to Best Buy.
less than 10m talk time = no restocking
less than 10mb of internet + the above = no restocking
vip customers = no restocking
defect with phone and customer wants diff model = no restocking
I agree with these rules more, however, people in the stores were absuing it therefor it had to be changed.
	

