Ok, but don't hold your breath on the 3D cameras because _I_ am the guy that made that up, in what I expected to be a humorous post that few would notice.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ok, but don't hold your breath on the 3D cameras because _I_ am the guy that made that up, in what I expected to be a humorous post that few would notice.

This just isn't going to be one of them, in my opinion.

Anyway - I just do this because I know some stuff about what they're announcing on the 7th and can't really say.
While that statement is 100% true it doesn't come out and say that I know what they're announcing on the 7th - because I don't. And that's how rumors get started.


That's some rumor to start!
Do we even have standalone 3D cameras available to the public?
Intrigued!
Can you say if you think we really are going to be blown away?![]()
Pfffft!! I totally guarantee it.

Nope, no sarcasm whatsover - I guarantee in the most srsly biznus fashion possible that you'll be blown away and also amazed.
Think about it - (hint: ) by definition.

1. Yes, the Red is out at a cost of thousands of dollars.
2. Remember that removable lens with optical zoom we put up for the BEVO 5G on page 1 of this thread?
Artefact
Thank goodness someone is actually thinking it through correctly.

The only problem I found is the idea that any camera can make you a better photographer, this is like saying a top of the line fast computer will make you a better programmer. A tool is a tool, not much help if you don't know how to use it.
As to 1, it should read $10,000+
2 is a wonderful concept, I especially like the image showing a Canon L series lens utilized, this will make it even more versatile. I am really excited about this one being a photographer myself.
The only problem I found is the idea that any camera can make you a better photographer, this is like saying a top of the line fast computer will make you a better programmer. A tool is a tool, not much help if you don't know how to use it.
That's a really good point ad I agree to a certain extent, but you have to remember that to build a program a user has to code/compile/test. While to take a picture you just press a button. Now if you build your program on tools such as a wysiwyg compiler the hard part becomes much easier to understand and execute. A camera is sort of the same way, if you give a novice photographer a high end slr with all the bells and whistles but they have to manually adjust each one no tripod or red eye correction you'll end up with something not so great... But on the other hand if you give them a new camera that can adjust for perfect shutter speed, light setting etc, etc... the novice user's picture might really shine even next to a professional's.
That's the path the camera industry has been striving for, it's FAR from perfect or even being close but the idea of automating everything humanly possible to capture the best still image possible and make it user friendly so even grandma can use it, well that concept has been around for years. We've come a long way but they're far from where we'd like to be, but progress is progress. Although I have to say 3D cameras don't really tickle my fancy just a personal opinion, if it's 3D I'd rather it be video.
You are right, if you simplify the process even Grandma might get lucky every once in a while and snap a picture that is really good, but it is more complicated than that. There is an art to taking a good picture, yes some are spontaneous shots that turn out fantastic, but there are many facets that require an "eye" for a scene. I have seen pictures taken side by side of the same subject matter that are worlds apart using similar equipment, there is a talent involved and having the best camera available will never make up for the lack thereof.
My wife and I have had similar discussions, she was in the "all it takes is a good digital camera and anyone can take good pictures" camp. We bought her mother a "good digital camera" for her trip to Cambodia and upon her return my wife quickly reversed her stance on this matter. Poorly framed shots are just that, no matter how accurate the exposure and focus are. And lighting a scene, even (or should I say especially) with natural light requires skill.
I am all for the improvements in technology, they make the pro's life easier as well. Digital has opened many doors, I had almost completely gotten out of photography due to film and processing costs, now I am back in as a hobby and not just professionally for promotional work related to my business. I look forward to what is coming!
I don't think the average person believes they are going to spend a ton on the camera and be shooting pictures for the covers of national geographic. But when you have a cell phone camera that is shooting grainy and blurry pictures, there is something to be said about hardware/software quality. I am by no means a pro (hell I consider myself less than novice, I know little more than point and shoot), but I have seen cell phone camera that take horrendous pictures and those that take really good ones (really good being something worth actually showing to someone because they can decipher what the heck the image is of). Take, for example, a pocket HD camcorder. If our phones can take pics and video like, say, a flip HD, I think the average consumer would be very happy with it.
As far as other things I would like to see (this brings other products into the mix), we need a remote desktop feature (wish I was a developer, this would be huge) that links to the head unit in your vehicle and displays exactly what is seen on your home screens. It will also need to be able to have full functionality such as apps, messaging, dialing, etc. Basically your screen ported to your radio!
You would connect to your in-dash via bluetooth or direct cable and your in-dash screen would display what is on your phone screen, basically a remote desktop connection. Think of it sort of like LogMeIn or Go To My PC running on your in-dash and controlling your phone that way.
Some manufacturers use Linux for the os on their head units so it should be possible at least with those.
Ah ok. I don't think that would be hard to do in theory. The bigget obstacle would be creating some sort of standard (or adopting a current one) and actually using said standard on different decks in car from aftermarket to those that come preinstalled or as a package from the dealer.

I'd buy this in a second.As far as other things I would like to see (this brings other products into the mix), we need a remote desktop feature (wish I was a developer, this would be huge) that links to the head unit in your vehicle and displays exactly what is seen on your home screens. It will also need to be able to have full functionality such as apps, messaging, dialing, etc. Basically your screen ported to your radio!