bouchigo
Android Expert
Im completely cool with liking AOSP for its inherent performance advantages...
However, your second point is worrisome for me...I harp on things like speed dial because its a very basic feature...the Motorola StarTac supported speed dial...
We are talking about a smart phone OS here...a lot of people try to beat up the OEMs for "ruining" Android with the UI skins and additions but frankly I don't think Android would have gotten as far as it did without them...AOSP is barebones and very plain (borderline ugly) as a UI and is missing some basic features you would expect from a smart phone...
UI skins like Blur, Sense, Touch Wiz etc are here to stay
I agree that those UI's are here to stay, and I would be fine with that if they were added in a way that they could be easily removed if not desired by the user.
The speed dial absence in not worrisome to me as I don't use it, and I don't think I know anyone that still uses it (well unless they have a "dumb phone, then they do). But, if it's a function you use I can see the concern; personally I just don't see speed dial as being a big concern (to me anyway), it's obvious it is to you, and that's fine too.
I'm actually more concerned about the graininess of incoming/outgoing caller id pics, and nothing has been done to correct that.
On your point that Android wouldn't have gotten as far as they have without the additional UI skins by the manufacturers, that may be true, but I think Google would have done something about improving their own skins if the manufacturers had gone Vanilla Android. This leads me back to my original point, Google doesn't worry about it too much because Manufacturers will make certain changes for them.
This is getting a little of topic, I think I will stop before I get in trouble again
