Never said the Bionic was crappy. Said it was too little too late. Turned out i was right didnt it? Samsung is great never said otherwise. What i did say is that i dont like the aesthetics of the Nexus. Must I like every handset a manufacturer makes or can i pick and choose what I find appealing?
I agree here. The Bionic is an outstanding device, but Motorola screwed up. If you're going over a typical refresh cycle, you release the new product in month 1, the slight refresh in month 7, and the NEW new product (update of the first model) in month 1 again. The Atrix and Bionic were originally intended to be similar phones (Bionic originally ran Tegra 2) and ship within months of each other. Instead, we get the Bionic in September, and the refresh of it (RAZR) 2 months later!
It's an outstanding device, but when the updated model is coming out 2 months later, what's the point? I see no purpose in the Bionic. There is nothing that it does, that I'm aware of, that sets it apart from the RAZR except for a removable battery. OTH, the RAZR improves on the atrocious screen, is clocked 200mhz higher, and claims to offer better battery life.
The big devices this quarter from the top OEMs are, IMO, the Galaxy S2 (Samsung), Spyder (Motorola), Sensation XE (HTC), and Galaxy Nexus (Google), as well as their variants, such as the RAZR (Spyder) or Rezound (Sensation XE). Samsung got theirs out in May, and it's still considered either the best or up there with the best 6 months later. That is DAMN impressive. If you imported a GS2 when they came out, you're STILL sitting pretty and will be for awhile.