Maybe Epstein's mother, but only if she has one hand on the Bible.
Guys, keep it light, I'm just trying to add some 'counterpoints' to the 1,000s of rumors that just never pan out. I want it as much as anyone, but I'm not setting myself up time after time for disappointment.
Maybe Epstein's mother, but only if she has one hand on the Bible.
Guys, keep it light, I'm just trying to add some 'counterpoints' to the 1,000s of rumors that just never pan out. I want it as much as anyone, but I'm not setting myself up time after time for disappointment.
That's impossible.
I know it goes against popular thinking, but most theorists are idiots. If they don't understand something, they always assume it's random. That's like a child saying that food just randomly appears on the table, because there's no way that his dad leaving for 8 hours per day has anything to do with it.
End of mini-rant.
), my string will be typed by a random coincidence.
It is not impossible. It is highly improbably.
Let us use a quick argument that can scale. I want a monkey to produce a 10,000 character string. Assume I give the monkey a keyboard with only letters/shift key. Thus, he has 52 choices for each space (each letter and its capital version).
So, the probability of him making the string on any given 10k letter run is
P(10k string == my string) = (1/52)^10000 = (1.923*10^-2)^10000. It is tiny. Almost all calculators will round it down to zero. But in reality it is not zero. So what we are saying is that given 1/P(10k string == my string) tries (again, just very large, NOT infinite), this monkey has a really good chance of coming up with my 10k character string.
Since 1/P(10k string == my string) is large but still < infinity, given infinite monkeys and infinite time (or just one monkey and infinite time, but I think we all like the idea of infinite monkeys
The same scales for the Bibile, Shakespeare, whatever.
-Nkk
Maybe Epstein's mother, but only if she has one hand on the Bible.
Guys, keep it light, I'm just trying to add some 'counterpoints' to the 1,000s of rumors that just never pan out. I want it as much as anyone, but I'm not setting myself up time after time for disappointment.
anticipation, even knowing that disappointment may follow. For every date that proved wrong there was another to latch onto. For me, that approach is much more fun than constant skepticism and expecting only disappointment. But I understand that some would rather avoid the highs and lows. To each his/her own.
How in the world does a SGSII or Galaxy Nexus "look like" an iPhone?? Gotta love Apple
I will be calling about six stores later today when not in earshot of my wife so that I don't have to listen to her whining.
Maybe Epstein's mother, but only if she has one hand on the Bible.
Guys, keep it light, I'm just trying to add some 'counterpoints' to the 1,000s of rumors that just never pan out. I want it as much as anyone, but I'm not setting myself up time after time for disappointment.
EVERYONE needs to take a step back and lighten up! Ken has just ben jaded too many times and he is sceptical. I dont blame him. Its just his opinion. No big deal.Here is why you are getting some push back on your many many "counterpoint" posts recently, you seem convinced that all rumors are false and all sources are fake and IF that is your opinion and you choose not to allow YOURSELF to be disappointed then we support your opinion and position.
But the fact is your "counterpoint" posts are attempting to sway others to join in on your opinion or position, why do you care if others believe all of the rumored release or pre-release dates, why would you care if we believe a source or two based on past creditable information?
Maybe you should take a step back and allow those members their opinion even if they differ from your own.
EVERYONE needs to take a step back and lighten up! Ken has just ben jaded too many times and he is sceptical. I dont blame him. Its just his opinion. No big deal.
