Yes, when you talk of a camera ability to take 12, 10,8, etc...in MP it simply is the ability to fill in pixels.. Anyone has zoomed up on a 1.3mp image and seen how it turns to crap. I am sure other people have snap a shot with 8mp and beyond and the results are impressive. The thing that helps with improved MP is not only the crispness of a shot, but the ability to zoom up to the image and still have the same crispness. I mean the EVO is coming close to rival most dedicated camera's in that regard IMHO
BSOD>_-O<
In terms of video, all those extra megapixels are going to waste. There is no difference in video resolution for 720p video shot from a 1mp or 10mp sensor, because the final video is being stored and compressed as 720p (less than 1 mp). What you're referring to is "digital zoom," which is the process of cropping the outside pixels of a photo to make the final version
appear as if it has been zoomed into. However, no additional detail is being created. Also, once a video is stored at 720p, all the extra pixels from a 10mp sensor have been binned. Those details are never recoverable again.
The point I was hoping to make was that 720p video shot from a Nokia N8, which has a 10mp sensor, will not appear sharper than 720p video shot from an EVO, which has a 8mp sensor, because the final video format can only handle a resolution of less than 1mp. The determining factor for video quality then will be things such as compression type and bandwidth as well as processing power for consistent framerates. If anything, if two sensors are different in megapixel count but identical in physical size, the quality of the pictures coming out of the lower-megapixel sensor will generally be of better quality (though less sharp). These images will have better dynamic range and less noise.
This is why an image from an 8mp phone cam like the EVO in many ways might actually look worse than an image from a 5mp phone cam. It may be sharper, but dynamic range and low-light performance generally suffer.
I just want to make sure we all have realistic expectations for the EVO. I know that Sprint is billing it as a replacement for other specialized devices, but I hope people will recognize that specialized devices will almost always outperform a device like the EVO, which has size, weight, and budget constraints. I'm definitely excited about using the EVO to take pictures and record video, but it will not replace my DSLR or even a good point and shoot when I'm concerned with technical and artistic quality... in the form of shallow depth of field, wide dynamic range, and natural low-light shooting (all things a phone cam can never accomplish because of the limitations placed on small sensors by the laws of physics).
For impromptu shots, though, the EVO's going to be great!
