Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't see why some people make such a big deal about others choosing to take advantage of the right to carry arms? If they choose to carry a gun to protects themselves and others when needed, then how does that bother you?
Some people act as if they are actually mad that people carry guns to protect themselves, like it is somehow interfering with their daily lives.. unless you're planning on robbing some of these people and are now angry to find out that they are concealing?
I wish the "instant email notification" worked better for me, as I just received my notification today of these topic replies.
To those who believe that carrying a gun or any other weapon means that you can protect yourself in a robbery - have you actually researched this? There are numerous books written on the subject and most police officers will tell you that you are MORE LIKELY to be attacked IF you carry a weapon. This is a statistical fact. You are actually creating more of a danger FOR YOURSELF by carrying a weapon. Seems kind of silly don't you think?
There was one comment in particular that has deeply disturbed me. "...someone who decides to rob someone else is a bad person." That kind of mentality is what is hurting society. You have no understanding or compassion for the other person. There are 1001 reasons why someone might rob a person and each of those 1001 reasons could happen in YOUR LIFE. You cannot judge a person for a single event in their life and you certainly shouldn't cause harm to that person because you believe they are "bad".
As another poster mentioned, you are far more likely to die of health problems than be a victim of a violent crime. How many of you gun owners also smoke and eat red meat?
I wish the "instant email notification" worked better for me, as I just received my notification today of these topic replies.
To those who believe that carrying a gun or any other weapon means that you can protect yourself in a robbery - have you actually researched this? There are numerous books written on the subject and most police officers will tell you that you are MORE LIKELY to be attacked IF you carry a weapon. This is a statistical fact. You are actually creating more of a danger FOR YOURSELF by carrying a weapon. Seems kind of silly don't you think?
There was one comment in particular that has deeply disturbed me. "...someone who decides to rob someone else is a bad person." That kind of mentality is what is hurting society. You have no understanding or compassion for the other person. There are 1001 reasons why someone might rob a person and each of those 1001 reasons could happen in YOUR LIFE. You cannot judge a person for a single event in their life and you certainly shouldn't cause harm to that person because you believe they are "bad".
As another poster mentioned, you are far more likely to die of health problems than be a victim of a violent crime. How many of you gun owners also smoke and eat red meat?
with no evidence showing fact you are spreading falsities as fact when they are actually your own opinion. and a "statistically" incorrect one at that.I wish the "instant email notification" worked better for me, as I just received my notification today of these topic replies.
To those who believe that carrying a gun or any other weapon means that you can protect yourself in a robbery - have you actually researched this? There are numerous books written on the subject and most police officers will tell you that you are MORE LIKELY to be attacked IF you carry a weapon. This is a statistical fact. You are actually creating more of a danger FOR YOURSELF by carrying a weapon. Seems kind of silly don't you think?
There was one comment in particular that has deeply disturbed me. "...someone who decides to rob someone else is a bad person." That kind of mentality is what is hurting society. You have no understanding or compassion for the other person. There are 1001 reasons why someone might rob a person and each of those 1001 reasons could happen in YOUR LIFE. You cannot judge a person for a single event in their life and you certainly shouldn't cause harm to that person because you believe they are "bad".
As another poster mentioned, you are far more likely to die of health problems than be a victim of a violent crime. How many of you gun owners also smoke and eat red meat?
I always carry a purse...cause I carry way too much crap on me XD
-my N1
-big ass wallet (that my N1 can fit into)
-big ass makeup bag with the works
-umbrella (cause I hate the rain and don't want to be caught off guard)
-ipod nano
-book
-napkins pack
-hand sanitizer
-water bottle
-compact reusable bag
-flash light (cause I hate the dark)
-mini hair spray can (cause pepper sprays are illegal)
-travel sewing kit (for when I lose a button or the seam rips)
-home made travel first aid kit (for when I get hurt)
-granola/rice crispie bar (for when I'm hungry on the train)
I wish the "instant email notification" worked better for me, as I just received my notification today of these topic replies.
To those who believe that carrying a gun or any other weapon means that you can protect yourself in a robbery - have you actually researched this? There are numerous books written on the subject and most police officers will tell you that you are MORE LIKELY to be attacked IF you carry a weapon. This is a statistical fact. You are actually creating more of a danger FOR YOURSELF by carrying a weapon. Seems kind of silly don't you think?
There was one comment in particular that has deeply disturbed me. "...someone who decides to rob someone else is a bad person." That kind of mentality is what is hurting society. You have no understanding or compassion for the other person. There are 1001 reasons why someone might rob a person and each of those 1001 reasons could happen in YOUR LIFE. You cannot judge a person for a single event in their life and you certainly shouldn't cause harm to that person because you believe they are "bad".
As another poster mentioned, you are far more likely to die of health problems than be a victim of a violent crime. How many of you gun owners also smoke and eat red meat?
AMEN to the hand sanitizer!
I'm actually more terrified of germs than anything else!!
Actually, I have researched it quite a bit and nothing I have ever seen points to a person who carries/owns a firearm being more likely to be a victim. I actually find the idea to be rather absurd. Most statics that I have seen show the exact opposite of what you are claiming. It is has been shown over and over again that the violent crime rate drops dramatically when a state or city allows concealed carry. It also has shown that cities that put a ban on firearms all together have swift increase in violent crimes. Keep in mind that we are talking about the U.S. Statistics for any other country don't count as they do not have the same laws that we do.
"In Canada, for example, people own as many shotguns and rifles as Americans but far fewer handguns, and Canada has about 10 percent of the U.S. rate of gun violence."
Boo. A few germs would do you some good.
Clearly, you haven't tried to search for the data:
Does carrying a gun make you safer? Early research results suggest the opposite | cleveland.com
There are many more and as I mentioned, BOOKS written on the subject.
I'd like to point out the following quotes from that article, as I think they speak for themselves:
"The U.S. has a far higher per capita rate of gun violence than any other developed country, he said. If guns really made us safer, he said, "we should be the safest country on Earth."
"In Canada, for example, people own as many shotguns and rifles as Americans but far fewer handguns, and Canada has about 10 percent of the U.S. rate of gun violence."
"His results, he said, show that guns did not, on average, protect those who possessed them from being shot in an assault -- and in fact raised the risk by four times or more."
Guns are not a tool for safety or peace. We need to build peaceful communities, rather than try to combat the problem it with weapons.
I tend to agree with this. My wife is almost always sick and I almost never get sick. She's a germ-a-phobe and I'm anything but. My theory is that some germs/bacteria strengthens your immune system and so far I haven't met anyone who disproves this theory... one way or the other.
Back on topic.
Guns are good!
Something you might not realize...Canada only has about 10% of the US POPULATION!!!! So the number somehow correlates to me.
Hand sanitizers are as closely related to the OP as guns were
Yeah it's a pretty popular theory with biologists that the human immune system needs exposing to all kinds of pathogens if you want it to develop properly. That's (supposedly) why allergies are way more common, now that we're much more hygienic.
I hope violence never touches your lives.
Clearly, you haven't tried to search for the data:
Does carrying a gun make you safer? Early research results suggest the opposite | cleveland.com
There are many more and as I mentioned, BOOKS written on the subject.
I'd like to point out the following quotes from that article, as I think they speak for themselves:
"The U.S. has a far higher per capita rate of gun violence than any other developed country, he said. If guns really made us safer, he said, "we should be the safest country on Earth."
"In Canada, for example, people own as many shotguns and rifles as Americans but far fewer handguns, and Canada has about 10 percent of the U.S. rate of gun violence."
"His results, he said, show that guns did not, on average, protect those who possessed them from being shot in an assault -- and in fact raised the risk by four times or more."
Guns are not a tool for safety or peace. We need to build peaceful communities, rather than try to combat the problem it with weapons.
For this study, he and his colleagues relied on the cooperation of police to get information on shootings in Philadelphia between 2003 and 2006 -- a total of 3,485.
The researchers got information as the shootings occurred -- the location, the victims' description and whether they had guns with them at the time.
Researchers randomly chose 677 of those victims for the study. They came from various occupations -- taxi drivers, bartenders, nurses and drug dealers. Fifty-three percent had criminal records. Six percent had guns with them when they were shot.
The controls were actually equally likely to have a gun with them, but more than 80 percent of them were at home at the time of the incident -- a big possible difference -- and many more people own guns than carry them. Only 9 percent of the victims were home when they were shot. Most were outdoors.
But several statisticians not involved in the gun research said you can't reach such sweeping conclusions with this kind of study. "There are some sketchy things going on here," said J. Michael Oakes, a sociologist at the University of Minnesota who reviewed the study at The Philadelphia Inquirer's request.
Studies that compare cases with controls were designed to look at cancer, he said.
"The foundation of the case control study is the sense that those who are the cases are exactly the same as those who are in the control group," he said. Here, Branas is assuming the people who were shot were no more likely to have guns than a group of controls of the same gender and racial mix. "It's a big stretch," he said.
Economist Jens Ludwig of the University of Chicago expressed similar reservations. "They can't tease out whether guns are contributing to assault or assault risk is contributing to gun ownership," he said.
Criminologist Gary Kleck of Florida State University said the Penn results can be explained by the fact that people who are at risk of being shot are also more likely to buy or carry guns. Such people might have dangerous jobs or belong to a street gang or be involved in the illicit drug trade, for example.
Adding corrections for race, neighborhood, sex and even drug trade ties, as Branas did, "doesn't alter the underlying flaw in the reasoning," Kleck said.
In an e-mail, Kleck explained his view with an analogy. "It is precisely as if medical researchers found that insulin use is more common among persons who suffer from diabetes than among those who are not diabetic (something that is most assuredly true), and concluded that insulin use raises one's risk of diabetes."
More guns do not equal less crime.
This is my last post on this forum.
I know that you guys will protect your right to carry guns with everything you've got. I hope violence never touches your lives.
There was one comment in particular that has deeply disturbed me. "...someone who decides to rob someone else is a bad person." That kind of mentality is what is hurting society. You have no understanding or compassion for the other person. There are 1001 reasons why someone might rob a person and each of those 1001 reasons could happen in YOUR LIFE. You cannot judge a person for a single event in their life and you certainly shouldn't cause harm to that person because you believe they are "bad".