I am in that "its not so bad" crowd as well.
The difference in the screen is obvious to many; even if slightly. At least its not over-saturated like the epic. At least you can read the screen in sunlight for the most part. This shouldn't be the deciding factor not to get the phone.
Personally, I am totally over it; after all I didn't base my decision to get this phone so to run around telling people how l33t my screen is, if I did want to run around bragging about my screen this isnt the phone; obviously.
I bought this phone to have an attractive, powerful, well constructed, highly productive smartphone with 4G that is also a good PHONE (with a little bit of bragging rights mixed in) to replace my poorly designed Evo 4G. F!#@ the screen issues.
I think something that doesn't help give the phone's screen justice is the color gradients motorola used in their GUI seem to be using low colors making a low pixel appearance, somewhat cartoony.
owell. there are bigger issues with the phone we should be talking about.
The difference in the screen is obvious to many; even if slightly. At least its not over-saturated like the epic. At least you can read the screen in sunlight for the most part. This shouldn't be the deciding factor not to get the phone.
Personally, I am totally over it; after all I didn't base my decision to get this phone so to run around telling people how l33t my screen is, if I did want to run around bragging about my screen this isnt the phone; obviously.
I bought this phone to have an attractive, powerful, well constructed, highly productive smartphone with 4G that is also a good PHONE (with a little bit of bragging rights mixed in) to replace my poorly designed Evo 4G. F!#@ the screen issues.
I think something that doesn't help give the phone's screen justice is the color gradients motorola used in their GUI seem to be using low colors making a low pixel appearance, somewhat cartoony.
owell. there are bigger issues with the phone we should be talking about.
Upvote
0