alostpacket
Over Macho Grande?
... Plus, anyone who calls themselves "Harry McCracken, Technologizer"....
lulz. I didnt even see that.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
... Plus, anyone who calls themselves "Harry McCracken, Technologizer"....
If you guys don't believe that the Android platform is fractured, then you are delusional and the only fan-boys are the ones on this thread. The fact of the matter is, Android IS VERY fractured. The hurried release of the latest and greatest devices within months of each other CANNOT be helping Android. It only serves to dilute the market and continue the fracturing. Since DROID owners will be getting 2.1 sometime soon (whatever that means), maybe we feel okay about it.
But what if our device was left in the dust? The valid point here is that the iPhone OS DOES only get updated once a year and that update is available and compatible with all iPhone devices. What you have then is a cohesive, connected platform, devoid of gaps and those left behind. It's the kind of attention to the consumer that is the reason there are so many Apple fan-boys. For all the attention that we put on "lag" in the OS performance, there should absolutely be NO LAG when it comes to updating devices. Right now, there should only be two Android OS on phones: 1) 1.6 for lesser devices, 2) 2.1-update1 for higher-end devices. And they should be pushed at the same time. Android should not be a world where there is 1.5, 1.6, 2.0, 2.0.1, 2.1, 2.1-update1 and whatever intermediate releases (i.e. the current CLIQ update).
The valid point here is that the iPhone OS DOES only get updated once a year and that update is available and compatible with all iPhone devices. What you have then is a cohesive, connected platform, devoid of gaps and those left behind.
I should friggin' have 2.1 on my phone PERIOD and I shouldn't have to become a part-time programmer and tweak my phone just to get bits and pieces of it.
I agree with this 100% and I have not read one negative article about the Droid. My opinion is based strictly on personal experiences with Android. The Droid is my first smartphone and I love it but the fragmentation is really a big issue for me. I bought my Droid and about a month later another Android phone with a better OS comes out and I want that exact same OS on my Droid and it really bothers me that I don't have it.
The splintering argument makes no sense. The Droid is as powerful as the 3GS so all iphone app makers can make their apps for Droid and then the apps will work on all more powerful phones. By the time the iphone 4G comes out, all Android phones will be much much faster, so they can just use the android phone that has the same cpu/gpu equivalent of the 4GS as their baseline.
Well then you wait till they release it my friend, that is how it has always been.
Wow, are these replies for real? Moto has already told us that 2.1 is coming for the Droid. As technology moves forward and one phone vendor beats another to the next update of the Android OS, are we going to need medication until we get the update? I guess patience isn't a value some people have anymore...

Sigh... 2.1 has been 'coming soon' for far too long. Furthermore, when we finally do get 2.1 (hopefully before the close of 2010), all indications are pointing to the fact that we are getting a SUBSTANTIALLY watered down version of 2.1 and all of the cool features will be missing. In my opinion, this is totally unacceptable and I'm not happy about it AT ALL, especially since I know that the Droid is absolutely capable of running full 2.1.
I know that inevitably someone will mention to me that I can just root and flash roms but, again, rooting and constantly trying to keep up with the latest ROMs is extremely time consuming and I have zero spare time. I don't even have time to be typing this post, quite honestly. And in any event, I shouldn't have to exert so much time and effort into hacking/programming my Droid just so I can get cool 2.1 features that should be stock anyway. I enjoy the customization of Droid in that I can have custom wallpapers, widgets, home replacements etc. because those things are fairly quick and easy to do but rooting is a bit much for me (time wise).
rootyourdroid.info said:All this
Sigh... 2.1 has been 'coming soon' for far too long. Furthermore, when we finally do get 2.1 (hopefully before the close of 2010), all indications are pointing to the fact that we are getting a SUBSTANTIALLY watered down version of 2.1 and all of the cool features will be missing. In my opinion, this is totally unacceptable and I'm not happy about it AT ALL, especially since I know that the Droid is absolutely capable of running full 2.1.
I know that inevitably someone will mention to me that I can just root and flash roms but, again, rooting and constantly trying to keep up with the latest ROMs is extremely time consuming and I have zero spare time. I don't even have time to be typing this post, quite honestly. And in any event, I shouldn't have to exert so much time and effort into hacking/programming my Droid just so I can get cool 2.1 features that should be stock anyway. I enjoy the customization of Droid in that I can have custom wallpapers, widgets, home replacements etc. because those things are fairly quick and easy to do but rooting is a bit much for me (time wise).
I know that inevitably someone will mention to me that I can just root and flash roms but, again, rooting and constantly trying to keep up with the latest ROMs is extremely time consuming and I have zero spare time. I don't even have time to be typing this post, quite honestly.

Ok, the title of the guy's article makes the point the Droid is already out of date and yesterday's technology.
He then tries to say the reason for this is the Android OS having different versions on different phones.
The "writer" *cough cough* doesn't talk about the Droid's processor, GPU, screen resolution, etc....his point is that the Droid is out of date because the Android OS has different versions on different phones. This is wrong.
Yes, Android OS might be "fractured" (which is not an accurate description by the way, its a very obvious dig at Android OS) but that doesn't mean that the Droid as a phone is extinct. Even with the release of Nexus One, the Droid still beats the iphone on many basic hardware statistics, will support flash, etc., so is the iphone out of date? Well, by this theory, no, because the iphone doesn't have the Android OS. I guess my 2003 Palm Treo 650 isn't stale bread either, because it doesn't have the Android OS.
If his article didn't mention the Droid, or at least talked about the phone's hardware in some way, it could be taken as a much more logical argument.
Yes, the Android OS releasing different versions can be a pain, but it doesn't make any particular model immediately "stale bread". (For me personally, I would rather wait for an update then have crashes and watch the meltdown on the forums of people yelling for a new patch!)
In case you hadn't noticed, PCWorld is nothing but a bunch of iPhone fanboys. They never EVER review any Android apps, yet there are half-a-dozen iPhone apps reviewed every day. They used to be good, then they drank the Apple Kool-Aid.
Listening to PC World for smartphone information is like reading Agriculture Today for help in Farmville... get over it, there will always be someone trying to bash your tech.
I'm no expert on Android or iPhones. I've had my Droid for about a month and really love it, after coming from Windows based phones.
I think there is a huge difference between a phone system that is on a single carrier with a single manufacturer (iPhone/Apple) versus a phone system that is on multiple carriers with multiple manufacturers. That to me, would be the biggest reason why there are so many different versions of the OS and while that part of may get streamlined somewhat in the future, I think there will always different versions. No matter how it turns out, I'm happy with what I got.![]()