i am dying to see what his lovely response will be...
Far be it from me to keep you waiting too long.
For those playing the home version of our game, I said that the corporations blew it with a grotesque violation of common sense in their respective supply chains.
Prior to this, the thread seems to have digressed to eating pancakes and who admires whom.
Your response contained your opinions - limited to the wonderfulness of the devices if you like, tho I caution that simply reduces the dimensionality of the discussion, something I wasn't expecting of you, but you insist that's what you've done, so that's perfectly OK by me - but the subject at hand was corporate practices.
And then....
I have no idea about JIT and i really could care less. I am a model and working my ass off in college to gain a degree in psychology and pursue FBI or CIA or DIA types of jobs with my degree...
Inventory of a product i am selling or marketing is something i could care less about
My mistake - I stand corrected. You were not actually replying to the point at hand, you were replying tangentially then. OK, I've no problem with that.
Other than to note that that part in particular is in itself no doubt giving others great cause for amusement, as you've since accused me of not responding directly to your actual statements.
again i am trying to find the basis of the majority of your response because from what i read, it is more of an indirect attack(hence "certainly within your rights as a fangirl" remark)
Your ability to indict me for feeling wronged in any way does not make you correct in any way. There is objective proof of this:
I am obsessed with phones not just android
Obsession = fangirl. Your obsessive tendencies are quite clear to a great many.
When a statement of fact is levied, slander has not occurred.
When you find indirect attack where there is none, the weakness is not in the person you've chosen to iconify for externalizing blame.
You'll need to investigate that part further in your psych studies. Shooting the messenger is no answer.
Now, that's more than an appropriate amount of response merited to your demands for attention.
When you do decide to think in terms of corporate skullduggery and the abuse of consumer rights leading to artificially high prices resulting from an artificial supply shortage, I'll be happy to discuss that further.
You've so far said that that sort of thing disinterests you. However, I don't live in the past and I'll be happy to leave the door open to you for that discussion. Besides, I know for a fact that the agencies you name value multidimensional thinking, so I'll be available when you'd like to practice that.
Your alternative would be to perfect tradecraft (look it up). It begins with a subtle picture of French fries and before you know it, you're sporting a Minox. Best luck with staying innocuous, a key part of tradecraft, so you'll have to decide very carefully whether you'd like to pursue that.