D
Deleted User
Guest
Here's a start
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AT&T: We had it wrong. The latest pricing for the Captivate is $199 with 2 year agreement and smartphone data plan is required. The non-commitment pricing is $499. We apologize.
I've pretty much given up on getting one early on Long Island or in Manhattan. Sucks to live in NY, huh?
Does AT&T saying on Facebook that it's $350, and then changing it this quickly, constitute a bait and switch? I feel like it does...
check this Price is $499, verified on facebook - Page 2 - xda-developersDoes AT&T saying on Facebook that it's $350, and then changing it this quickly, constitute a bait and switch? I feel like it does...
I've pretty much given up on getting one early on Long Island or in Manhattan. Sucks to live in NY, huh?
I'd recommend that everyone that gets this phone for $499 off contract file a claim with the Federal Trade Commission and/or the Attorney General of there state. False advertising is a crime, and AT&T has done it this time. The fact that they sold it to some customers for $349 before switching to $499 clearly shows that this was not a simple error on the part of mistaken person posting on twitter and facebook.
They never advertised it officially though. You'd have to demonstrate to a jury that a company's facebook posts are considered legally binding contractual advertisement releases. That, to my understanding, has never been done. Even now, the Captivate page still just says "coming soon".
They never advertised it officially though. You'd have to demonstrate to a jury that a company's facebook posts are considered legally binding contractual advertisement releases. That, to my understanding, has never been done. Even now, the Captivate page still just says "coming soon".
They also told people who came into stores that the price was $350. Does it have to be printed on paper or on TV or on the radio to be binding? I'll admit, I am not a lawyer, so I really am not sure, but it sounds fishy to me.