• After 15+ years, we've made a big change: Android Forums is now Early Bird Club. Learn more here.

Root Id like to know why....

Status
Not open for further replies.
A lot of drama has been going on...
Not sure what to say.
Why can't we have a "rom submittion" method.
Were participation devs (either for the phone the rom or software it was built for or outside of thqt phone. Example: a prevailer helping authenticate a new warp rom) help test or verify the ROM.
Maybe an authenricating badge can be placed on the OP for that certain thread.
 
Not sure why a Mod would punish someone to go after trolls ( dev wannabe's ).....I am a moderator too and I try to get rid of trolls, bad people, wannabe's etc. myself..... So if I miss such a person, I'd be thankful to other's who recognized them as "fakes" and take some action ! ( I am a mod in an non-technical forum ) But if some fake "wannabe-dev" is bricking other peoples property, ANY and I say ANY moderator with some brain should be greatful for the help in identifying fakes and warn people about them !!!

And that's my personal opinion !

vce

The catch to all of that is that PUBLICLY going after someone here at AF is not allowed (per OUR Forum Rules that everyone agreed to when signing up). They aren't just random words on a page and are there for a reason. They are the rules we enforce. They apply to all (noob, developer, troll, fanboi, man, woman, etc). There is a system in place for these very reasons and problems. That's what the report button is for.

As we've stated many times in many places and in many threads, attack issues and not users.

If something is suspicious, report it with as much detail as you can and we'll address it (sometimes it's lengthy PMs back and forth with you trying to get the scoop... sometimes it's obvious what's up). Regardless, as mentioned on the first page, we don't and never ban based on suspicion alone.

As a moderator on another site, I'm sure you understand the tools available to us, the owner and the admin. I'm sure you understand that there are rules that, as staff, WE must follow before acting on certain items. The regular user and even the guides on the forum don't have access to those tools or that information so making claims that can't be proven just, let's be frank, done to piss people off and cause more harm than good. That being said, if they do (or think they have) proof, click the report button and bring it to us. We GLADLY welcome the information!

Everything is a fine line... some people get upset and say we have done too much. Others say we haven't done enough. We follow the action and guidance and rules that the owner and admin have set in place (as well it should be... I'm not the one paying the bills after all).

:)

PG - PM me. ;)
 
I was informed as to why it was deleted and I understand and agree with the reasoning. Please PM Kelmar or myself for the reasoning. ;)

Thanks PG



Bubbleboy81:

For COMPLETE clarity:

Should you wish to reply in this thread, please do so by contacting Phases to have your original account reopened. Sock puppet accounts used to create drama (removed above) will not be tolerated. As mentioned in the forum rules, should you wish to dispute your no posting probation, please contact Phases.
 
I appreciate all what was said here
But to be totally fair about this and get the issue resolved
I believe hroark should be able to have a statement here!
You made it clear the way that you saw it
And I believe hroark has a statement the way he saw it
Such a person as hroark that helped a lot of people and was kind a lot of people should be allowed to have a statement on this post
I believe that maybe we can come to some sort of resolve!
So instead of sequestering hroark and the people who try to post his response why not demonstrate justice and fairness?
 
The concerns have been addressed, this has already been reviewed.

I have no doubt that hroark13 believes what he said.

Getting do-overs isn't going to change reality or the past.

And hroark13 has already had a statement here, despite being gone.

Sorry, but it is what it is.

PS - I was asked to respond. In the interest of transparency, I did.

If you want to debate what was said among yourselves, great! :) Enjoy the forum, that's why it's here! :)

But neither I, nor hroark13 through third parties, are going to debate the matter here any further.

That's just drama and drama is fair to no one. ;)
 
to be honest...
im not sure whats going on...
didnt really know Hroark
i do think he was a great foundation to the prevail community.
but i know moderators are many and it would be unwise and pretty bad of them to take out one of their own.
so i think they were right in the fact that they didnt want to let someone get power hungry.

even if it was one of the godfathers.

(even mob bosses have bosses, no?)


i also think it could of been handled better... by both parties..

im still new.
and eager to learn.
so i think instead of grieving on the lost.
that we pick ourselves up and prevail over this loss.
we can become many more develepors. or tweakers..
or app creators..
but if we let the loss of one person crumble what many have built it would all go to waste.
and i dont think HRK would want that.. he worked hard to get us here. with many of the other developers..
so i suggest we stand up, dust off.
and prevail over this and win back our forums! :ridinghorse:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom