• After 15+ years, we've made a big change: Android Forums is now Early Bird Club. Learn more here.

Nexus Vs Razr

Pretty interesting chat - just joined but think I'll lurk this one out. :)

OBTW - just some friendly advice: these things go easily when credentials don't become too big - they have a way of getting a life of their own.

Cool and easy way:

"OK, that's interesting. I disagree, but it's interesting. Mind if I ask what you do? Do you work on/in/with/near/for/about this?

"Oh, hey, thanks for asking. Yes, I did...
In fact, I've already deleted some of my posts in the big Gnex thread for the opposite of that.

Anyway - looks like you're both past that point and doing fine. I'm just leaving this announcement just because.

Stay cool, thanks.

/not lurking
 
I like everything about the Moto Razr except the terrible branding on the front of the phone. What makes the IPhone and Samsung Nuxus look so sleek is they keep all branding on the back of the phone. I did a mock up in Photoshop to show me what the Moto Razr would look like without the Motorola and Verizon branding on the front of the phone. To be quite honest it makes the Razr look so much sleeker and your eyes are not drawn away from the screen by the horrific branding glaring at you. To be quite honest the designers of the Razr should have put the Motorola and Verizon branding on the back, it would have been a 100% nicer/sleeker looking phone.
 
I apologize, I let my frustration get the best of me. Not that it excuses it, but my frustration is that one person claimed that they saw a pic from P3Droid that showed only 10GB available to the user, and it spread like wildfire, yet anyone that saw the pic clearly saw 13+ GB. I was further frustrated that an intelligent person such as yourself took that "spec" and ran with it, rather than investigate it yourself.

When I saw the posts (a few others were saying it in the Nexus mega-thread, not just you), I said to myself, "Self, 10GB out of 16GB doesn't sound right, now does it? Let's take a look at this supposed P3Droid pic." And, well, I took a look and saw that the rumor was wrong.



Does it matter? If retail is adding 3GB of bloat, then Houston, we have a problem! As I said, no Android phone allows for more than 256MB (if even that much) for firmware. 1.5GB-3GB of bloat should send off alarms in your head and say "maybe this source was wrong."



I'm sorry, but I respectfully disagree. Looking at the Motorola Xoom system dump shows that HC's total package size is 112MB zipped (183MB unpacked). That's with default apps.



I was actually preparing for the worst (what you just said) and hoping for the best. Thankfully, BMX tweeted a few hours ago that Google is handling the updates directly (and thus, no VZW bloat), and this was one of the "musts" that Google required for their Nexus. The closest we're getting to VZW branding on this device is their 4GLTE logo under the camera. MAP shows a subsidized price of $299.99.However, this is unconfirmed, just the current rumor of the moment.

LINK: http://twitter.com/#!/black_man_x/status/127748960877166592



Yes, but (if we're still talking about the 3GB difference or "1GB floor"), no combination of default apps takes up that much space. For comparison, the Droid Incredible GB update is LOADED with Verizon bloat, HTC Sense, Sense apps, and Google apps, and was still under 200MB when unpacked. The Xoom, as mentioned, was just over 180MB, and that's HC. The leaked Galaxy Nexus app lists don't show anything out of the ordinary, and due to being a vanilla device, look to have even less space taken up by framework and apps. I'm sorry bud, but everything that's out right now contradicts what you've said. Now, if it releases and there is really only 10/16GB and/or 24/32GB available to the user, believe me, I will publicly eat crow for being wrong.



I disagree with you on two points here. First, I don't think there will be this 1GB overhead that you're referencing, and we'll see on that (as of now, it doesn't exist on the unit that P3Droid has). Second, even if you are right there, that's a difference of 12.3GB vs 10GB (your stated amount), which is not a difference of simply 1GB. I am trying to be respectful, and I know that you are as well, but it seems as if you like to slowly contradict my points by moving the goal posts on yours. I just want to clarify that you stated that "only 10GB is available" and I'm stating that 13.3GB is available to the user. We'll see who is right, but please don't tell me that we're off by only 1GB, because we aren't.



With all due respect, you were a buyer, not a designer. I've actually repaired and worked on these chips and their boards under a high-grade microscope. If you want, I'll even email you my transcripts as proof. Your comment is akin to the video game marketing department telling the coder how the game works.

EDIT: Just want to add that I wasn't GOOD at it, just trained at it for one of my first military jobs. I was pretty lazy back then, and you could tell who did what board just by how good (or lousy) the soldering job was. Hint: I was among the worst. I even destroyed a video card on my first personal attempt at modifying one, but successive attempts were pretty nice (replaced an R350 chip with an R360, then flashed the updated bios, resulted in a $400 video card for $200).



And again, I apologize for my statements coming off that way. I try to deal in facts (and I usually try to point out posts that are speculation on my part). Your statements came off to me as speculation, so I wanted to post evidence of why I felt that they were wrong. But, the most civil thing will be to wait until the final product is released.


Nah, not moving goal posts, just bad math on my part while waiting on an oil change. Point is I am accounting for a known issue with HC (space floor) and your number was not.

In summary, if we are not accounting for a floor ATM, there will be about 11gb for the 16gb and 25gb for the 32gb. It will be a small miracle if VZW allows a non Rednetized' device to release subsidized. Warranty issues too, but per VZW, we should know "later this year".

The key still is the space for the Nexus is apparent and depends on how many apps you install. The more apps you install, the media space goes away. Based on posts and assumptions in the Nexus thread, this dynamic is missed by many. Reliance on cloud storage also seems impractical, unless you do not travel much, have unlimited data and live in great coverage areas.

Seems reliable and affordable cloud reliance by consumers is a few years and FCC battles with carriers away (assuming those battles are wins for the consumer.... yeah right).

BTW, be careful, since if your experience is from the government or military, you want to avoid divulging much of anything :eek:;) Well, that is what I was told and signed, during security debrief when leaving active duty.

Also: For the Nexus, if the storage space is near where I assert and VZW offers the 16gb version for $300, PLUS, if the 4430 has heat and battery life issues on the Razr, I will NOT say I told everybody so ;) I do not like kicking people while down :)

Besides, I am counting on your re-badge theory for the 4430, but my Droid 3 was released just a few months ago, so am not expecting too much yet, unless they have bled through inventory and a new rev is being made.

Added:

Still have that posted issue about the sim card and the FCC... Is it going to be a world phone or not? Need that.
 
Ok.... my fellow people on the fence! As of now, what are you looking at to become your next phone...GNex or Razr?

We for the most part know the pros and cons at this point, for the exception of release dates and price!

Currently where i'm at is here...
I'm a phone whore, so its a 3/4 month window with me on this next buy until I would be looking for the next great thing.. However....

After coming to terms with maybe just getting used to using the cloud, and taking the plunge in order to have major updates pushed asap to my phone...I was leaning towards the GNex....

But if reports are in fact true and playout where the GNex does not have Gorilla Glass....well then that would scratch the phone all together for me! No I don't like screen protectors...lol! But on a serious note, that would take me out if the game completely.

As for the Razr...we all know its a tank on how its built. Providing that the GNex is Gorrila Glass free, and the Razr camera is improved compared to the Bionic, namely the crazy delayed auto focus....It will be my next phone!

If its the same camera, with the same delay! Well then i'll do what some of my fellow peeps have said....Sit back, and wait to see what early 2012 brings.
 
Not going to argue for the simple reason that you have your stance and I have mine. Like we both said, we'll see when it drops. However, this caught my eye.



I read it as "renecktized" the first time and THIS popped into my head...

Jeff Dunham and Bubba J - YouTube


That is funny :)

This is not: Droid Razr hands-on: Fast, slim, gorgeous | Android Atlas - CNET Reviews

Towards the bottom there is a comment it is not a world phone, but why have the slim slot? My hope is the author assumed this and expected to see a standard size sim slot. I hijacked this from the World phone thread.
 
That's not what it is (dynamic storage). What it's telling you is that Xmb is used by apps, and the rest is available. Install a 7MB app, and that Xmb goes up by 7, and the available goes down by 7. It's not dynamic, it's just reporting use like any other storage manager (My Computer). That 66.xMB you're seeing for apps isn't an allocation, but rather, actual storage taken up by apps.


What I meant by that was that all of the available space could be used for apps or user data. This is in contrast to the DX that I have where I have 8GB for app storage that can't be used for anything else and then the SD card to use how I want.
 
What I meant by that was that all of the available space could be used for apps or user data. This is in contrast to the DX that I have where I have 8GB for app storage that can't be used for anything else and then the SD card to use how I want.


That IS an absolute, since the internal storage design for HC and ICS means you have a displacing / finite amount of space and the more apps you install, the less media & vice-versa'.

For my D3, Flyer and Thrive, I place game roms that need to be in the internal (MAME and Tiger Arcade: 6gb) in the internal and save the rest for apps and data. I use microsd and sdxc (Thrive) cards for media.

Can not do that with the Nexus, but will work sweet with the Razr and the easy access micro slot. Dang, not only do I have to rely on Medion being correct about a 4430 re-badge, I now have to hope world phone function is coming before the end of 2012.
 
I wonder with Google buying moto if we will start to see faster updates from moto? I know if they could guarantee fast updates and not be waiting months and months i def would get the razr.
 
I wonder with Google buying moto if we will start to see faster updates from moto? I know if they could guarantee fast updates and not be waiting months and months i def would get the razr.


I would assume so. Google is going to want Motorola to have much better support in the form of quick updates to the end user. Hopefully we will see that benifit.
 
To me the only pros that Razr got over Nexus is sd slot and build quality. Nexus has edge on pretty much everything else. Samsung phones typical don't have good perceived build quality but real build quality is often much better than what it looks. Both SGS1 and SGS2 seems to be pretty good on drop/shock test, better than iPhone4. I saw somewhere that Nexus has metal body just underneath the plastic surface for better strength and integrity. So I'm pretty sure its real build quality is just as good as Razr. Even though they didn't state it specifically, it should be using Gorilla or similar glass too.

My only gripe with Nexus is lack of sd slot and really hope 32Gb version is offered. I'm still quite puzzled by fixed battery on Razr. To me it could be potentially more troublesome than lack of sd slot. I will look at how Razr does on the heat, battery for first a few weeks rather than jumping on it the first day.
 
I would assume so. Google is going to want Motorola to have much better support in the form of quick updates to the end user. Hopefully we will see that benifit.
How much of the update cycle is driven by the manufacture vs the carrier? Will Big Red be the stick in the mud?

And will Google risk ticking off the GNex owners by reducing their update lead time?
 
How much of the update cycle is driven by the manufacture vs the carrier? Will Big Red be the stick in the mud?

And will Google risk ticking off the GNex owners by reducing their update lead time?

I don't think people really care how much lead time they have with an update if they have a nexus they just want updates. Also the updates depend on the manufacture the most and carriers second since the manufacturer is the one issuing the updates to verizon to test.
 
One thing I'm very curious in Razr is camera. Bionic promised to bring much improved camera than DX but it didn't really happen.
 
What does it say about android as an OS if people are that starved for the next update too?!


It says that the hype of the newest/latest/greatest has a lot of appeal. IMO the hype of every new OS update far outweighs the postives of the update itself once it finally hits. In other words, people get overly worked up over possible OS updates.
 
List of displays by pixel density - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Shows the pixel density of most phones out there. THAT is the true LOOK of sharpness. Pixel density is the amount of pixels within an inch of the actual display.
The given dimensions of the Nexus is 1280 x 720 at 4.6" and gives a PPI of 319.
The RAZR resolution is 540x960 pixels, which gives a pixel density of 256ppi.
This from Apple Insider. (take it or leave it) By calculating the "real" pixel density of the display with the PenTile subpixel sharing, the Galaxy Nexus is said to have a pixel-per-inch number of about 200, which is just slightly higher than the Super AMOLED Plus screen on the Galaxy S II.
We really need to verify this from a non biased source. If the real Pixel density is 200, I would say that the RAZR would be better then. But if the Nexus is indeed 319, it blows a LOT of phones out of the water. I don't know what the eyes discernible point is, but I would guess that anything over 300 would not be noticeable to the human eye. I think that I could tell the difference between 256 and 319 though. I'm going on about this because to me screen density is a huge factor in the quality of experience.
Also for anyone who would like the calculations for PPI. you take the pixels high and square it. You take the pixels wide and square it. you add those two numbers and figure the square root of the sum. Then you take the square root number and divide by the diagonal in inches. That gives you the PPI or pixel density. Because of different screen sizes it can be deceiving. You can figure it out this way to have the correct figure. AND the proper figure that really makes the difference.
In addition I think the weight of the phone makes a difference too. I like a heavier phone as it sits in the hand with a sense of security. I love my X right now for that feel. I hope that the RAZR and the Nexus feel as good.
And for anyone willing to Root, ICS will be available sooner than the OTA. ICS is one of the main arguments for going with the Nexus. So if that is the only advantage I would go with the RAZR and Root.
 
It says that the hype of the newest/latest/greatest has a lot of appeal. IMO the hype of every new OS update far outweighs the postives of the update itself once it finally hits. In other words, people get overly worked up over possible OS updates.


I am happy with GB on the D3 and Flyer. Key for me is app performance and all that I use perform fine with GB and ditto with the HC on the Thrive. Seems some folks have a new update OS compulsive disorder.

I am like that with Apple (iPod) and Android apps, but not the OS..... I guess my disorder is wor$e.
 
Deal should be done by years end latest so I guess we will find out soon enough. Info coming in from actual Moto employees say it will in fact receive jellybean as well.

Probably won't be by year's end. If lucky, by Q1 next year...my hunch is Q2. DOJ antitrust division has done a 'second request' for more information about the deal. I think I've read in the past that only about 4% of all mergers get 2nd requests for info by DOJ. It probably won't hold up the deal, but the merger will not be allowed to be consummated until that info is provided, reviewed and ultimately approved...
 
Back
Top Bottom