A little OT but it really bugs me. Why are people's two and one year old smartphones on their last legs?
We pay at least $200 for these phones and as in my case usually more (full retail). THEY SHOULD LAST LONGER!
I have old flip phones that are 5+ years old and they work fine. I realize these smart phones are more advanced hence more things to go wrong but technology is also more advanced so why the big step back in longevity?
I just feel If they only allow us to upgrade at a subsidized price every two years the equipment should be able to make it.
I know I will get flamed but if I owned VZW I would allow you to upgrade every six months at a subsidized price. If you did upgrade it would subsequently reset your contract therefore locking you in longer. WIN WIN![]()
Keep in mind, the average person USES their smartphone about 10 times more in those 2 years then most people used their old flip phones in 5 years. I'm on my DROID inc. probably 2-3 hours a DAY.
It's still in "good" shape, except for the battery, which is another thing a battery loses 20-30% of its capacity over 2-3 years. When your phone sat there in "stand-by" for 5-6 days and now it only lasts 4-5 that's not a big deal. When your smart phone that lasted maybe 8-10 is now lasting 6-7 that's a lot more noticeable.
With the exception of my work computer, my cell(computer) phone is by FAR my most used piece of electronics.