• After 15+ years, we've made a big change: Android Forums is now Early Bird Club. Learn more here.

People from UK Read.

*looks at Outlaw* Canadian here too...I think we should be considered a part of UK (actually we were until 158 or so years ago)...

Well technically we've only been 100% on our own since 1982. That's when the Canada Act was finalized that severed the vestiges of legal dependence on the British Parlament.

 
Well technically we've only been 100% on our own since 1982. That's when the Canada Act was finalized that severed the vestiges of legal dependence on the British Parlament.
That's just the technicallity and detailed that needed to be ironed out...confedration happened in 1867...that's all that matters. So Canada is only 144 years old. It's younger than I thought O.o I swore I celebrated its 150th bday O.o I mean...I remember it being BIG!!! lol.

I love how we've hijacked a brit thread :rolleyes:
 
I know, I just found it amusing how we still had a few ties to England all the way up until 1982. That's the story of Candada alright, never in too big of a hurry to do anything.

"We'll get it done...... right after the hockey game"!


:D
 
I know, I just found it amusing how we still had a few ties to England all the way up until 1982. That's the story of Candada alright, never in too big of a hurry to do anything.

"We'll get it done...... right after the hockey game"!


:D
Yup...seems like it took over 100 years for real independence. No wonder those Americans make fun of us :rolleyes: They had to fight a bloody war to get their independence. We were given ours on a platter and took our sweet time to finalize it. So we basically didn't get full independence until parliment wrote the charter of rights and freedom. Anyways, we still got plenty of ties to our British brothers *points* Victoria's Day...we even enact a Govenor General to be the Queen representative. There are more that I can't remember. I guess us Canucks just love the Brits :D
 
Yup...seems like it took over 100 years for real independence.

The first time that Canada officially acted as a country independent of the UK was at the Treaty of Versailles. This was the event that brought The Great War (World War I) to an official close. Canada was officially recognised on the international stage as a nation separate from the UK. The US at the time was actually against Canada signing as a separate nation on the treaty.

No wonder those Americans make fun of us :rolleyes: They had to fight a bloody war to get their independence. We were given ours on a platter and took our sweet time to finalize it.

I'm proud of the fact that Canada can achieve independence through peaceful means instead of a major bloody war.

So we basically didn't get full independence until parliment wrote the charter of rights and freedom.

The Charter was designed to ensure that our old Bill of Rights (which is more or less a similar document) could not be easily changed by a simple majority of parliament. The Bill was like any other bill and the next goverment could simply reverse or change things. Having the Charter ensured that the Rights and Freedoms applied in all juristictions (federal, provincial, territorial and municipal) and could not be changed easily. Although we officially achieved more independence as a result, in practice the UK had not asserted any power over Canada for decades prior.

Anyways, we still got plenty of ties to our British brothers *points* Victoria's Day...we even enact a Govenor General to be the Queen representative. There are more that I can't remember. I guess us Canucks just love the Brits :D

The Queen reigns, but does not rule and we welcome Prince William and Kate Middleton when they come and visit.
 
I'm proud of the fact that Canada can achieve independence through peaceful means instead of a major bloody war.
Which reinforce our Peace keeping ways. I did put a :rolleyes: when I said that earlier.

The Queen reigns, but does not rule and we welcome Prince William and Kate Middleton when they come and visit.
*slaps forehead* What's the whole point of having a Monarch when you have a parliment :/ I never did understand that other than it's a very EXPENSIVE symbol.
 
What's the whole point of having a Monarch when you have a parliment :/

It's more humane keeping them as pets than executing them. :)

I never did understand that other than it's a very EXPENSIVE symbol.

I'm pretty sure they give a decent return on the investment. Ever seen the crowds outside Buckingham Palace? They're one of the UK's top tourist attractions.....seriously.
 
do you live under rock?!?!? :mad:
worlds worst banks
[deleted by Mod]
But it's not as bad as Greece!

It's more humane keeping them as pets than executing them. :)
*shouts in the Queen of Heart's voice* off with their heads!!!


I'm pretty sure they give a decent return on the investment. Ever seen the crowds outside Buckingham Palace? They're one of the UK's top tourist attractions.....seriously.
haha...*raises hand* I am guilty as charged there >_>;; Though the front...Buckingham Palance is one ugly building. I don't know why it doesn't look like Winsor Castle? Now I have a horrid association that Palance exterior=ugly, while Castle=pretty. I did enjoy the park across the street from the palace with its gold gate and there was a Canadian monument there too!!! The joy of finding something Canadian when I was in London!!! lol
 
*slaps forehead* What's the whole point of having a Monarch when you have a parliment :/ I never did understand that other than it's a very EXPENSIVE symbol.

I never understood when I was younger. As I got older, I rather warmed up to the monarchy. Perhaps the older I get the more I'm into "traditional" things.
 
It's more humane keeping them as pets than executing them. :)

Expensive pets, and executions did used to bring in the crowds. :) And I bet the loss to tourism could be compensated for by opening Buck house / Windsor castle / Balmoral as exclusive hotels.

I didn't pay enough attention in history but somehow we managed to have a civil war and the monarchists lost and yet we still have a monarchy. :confused:
 
Expensive pets, and executions did used to bring in the crowds. :) And I bet the loss to tourism could be compensated for by opening Buck house / Windsor castle / Balmoral as exclusive hotels.

I didn't pay enough attention in history but somehow we managed to have a civil war and the monarchists lost and yet we still have a monarchy. :confused:
hmm was that when England became Democratic and the Monach lost its ruling power which went to Parliment? That's the only explanation I can think of that makes sense, lol.
 
Back
Top Bottom