• After 15+ years, we've made a big change: Android Forums is now Early Bird Club. Learn more here.

Quadrant score?

1245
Reboot -> 798 (double-you, tea, eff ?)
1313 (No reboot, no changes, just rerun of Quadrant)
1285 after reboot and sitting a couple minutes

Throw out the high and low scores, and I average 1265, PLUS I can "talk to sexy single girls" near me, FOR FREE!

quad1313.jpg
 
Fenotyp said:
1245
Reboot -> 798 (double-you, tea, eff ?)
1313 (No reboot, no changes, just rerun of Quadrant)
1285 after reboot and sitting a couple minutes

Throw out the high and low scores, and I average 1265, PLUS I can "talk to sexy single girls" near me, FOR FREE!
Click to expand...

1313, plus sexy girls! w00t!

So, you got that going for you. Which is nice! :) [gunga. gunga-galunga :D].

BTW, if you run Quadrant right after you reboot, there's probably still stuff launching from the boot.
 
Ran it on 7/21, got 1245.
Ran it last night, got something in the 780 range (can't recall exactly, cuz I was so pissed)
Ran it again just now, got 1272.

I think it was due to the weaker reception at home...I'm hoping.
 
I'm not sure what causes an excessively low score but I'm usually between 1280 and 1315. I've had a few in the 800 range.
 
ckochinsky125 said:
Samsung cant keep up speedwise they rely on gaming and not speed
Click to expand...


Sorry but you are incorrect. If you actually look at the results from the tests individually using Quadrant Pro you would see that the Samsung actually scores slightly higher in the CPU test and dramatically higher in the graphics test. The X scored slightly higher in the memory test.

Where the Samsung is slower and what causes its overall score to be much lower is in the IO tests. Some think this is a bug, there are several different fixes floating around that bring the Samsungs score up to the level of the X and in one case brings it's score into the 1700's.

See this link for more info on the individual tests.

What is the fastest Android phone? – Android and Me

Here is the qudrant results for a Samsung device with the IO fix.. That's a 1723 on 2.1
 

Attachments

  • quadrantpage.jpg
    quadrantpage.jpg
    93.5 KB · Views: 119
why does the X score so high in quadrant when compared to the Inc, but the linpack are almost identical. is this purely the graphics advantages. it seems like straight processing power is comparable.
 
double said:
why does the X score so high in quadrant when compared to the Inc, but the linpack are almost identical. is this purely the graphics advantages. it seems like straight processing power is comparable.
Click to expand...

Its based on the post right above yours.....:p Just click that link and look at the breakdown. The EVO and Nexus 1 has the Snapdragon. The EVO has the same one as the Inc, the Nexus 1 does too, just the GSM version. Dont know if the GSM version is all that different except for GSM features.

Even Anandtech basically said cpu to cpu the OMAP 3630 and Snapdragon have almost identical processing power.

Motorola Droid X: Thoroughly Reviewed - AnandTech :: Your Source for Hardware Analysis and News

The higher X scores vs. the Inc. are probably memory, the I/O, (the read/write) and gpu.
 
My q-score was a 1265. I don't know what this # means, but good to see my phone as being healthy or where it should be.
 
Quandrant = 1260
Linpack = 8.19 mflops in 0.66 seconds

Both benchmarks were run after running the phone normally for about 5 hours (ie I didn't reboot the phone and run it).
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom