• After 15+ years, we've made a big change: Android Forums is now Early Bird Club. Learn more here.

***Official Galaxy Nexus Pre-Release speculation thread**

Status
Not open for further replies.
I REALLY hope its metal instead of plastic. Plastic would be terrible.

And was black man x being sarcastic on his last tweet? I couldn't tell. The first part sounds serious and the second part sounds sarcastic
 
Indeed, looks like it's a solid camera.

Also, I just might've missed it, but where'd you glean that it would be plastic and not metal?

I asked on that chat page and they answered it. Don't know who answered it, but according to people here, it's gospel! ;)
 
While that's somewhat disappointing, I would rather have a 4.65 inch plastic phone that fits into my pocket than a metal brick which doesn't

Edit:


Ooooohh, the first rumor that actually seems believable. Except it coincides with the Moto event, doesn't it?

It could be that Samsung is looking to take the wind out of Moto's sails and Google is trying to prove it isn't going to favor Moto. I, of course, base this on nothing but my own thoughts.
 
The only thing about the new date is that it's not in the US (Hong Kong). I don't really care. Just announce it. It could be on Mars for all I care.
 
There's a lot of dorks on IRC but usually it starts out with some knowledgeable users, then gets flooded with idiots. I got on there when it was just getting started and I trust much of the info that was posted early. I would bet my bottom dollar that they did in fact get this info from a test phone. The only question is...was it the final product? Makes sense that it probably would be since otherwise there's no real reason to test in the first place. They admitted "older" firmware but unlikely that the hardware is going to magically change unless they updated the phone's internals and left them out of the loop which once again doesn't make any sense other than an intentional deception campaign which is reaching bigtime.
 
aren't these essentially just the BGR specs?

Similar, but if we remember, vz_wired said there were four incorrect specs from BGR.
Comparing this new set of specs to BGR, we find the following differences:

1) TI OMAP4460 with dual-Cortex A9 cores clocked @ 1.5GHz (BGR claimed 1.2GHz)
2) 2MP Front facing camera (BGR claimed 1.3MP)
3) Rumored SAMOLED+ display (just because it's samsung, not actually confirmed) (BGR claimed regulard SAMOLED, not SAMOLED+)

Which would leave just one more difference. My guess would be the battery (BGR claimed 1,750mAh).

However, I'm a bit skeptical about the SAMOLED+ screen, which would then leave an additional difference...
 
In case anyone cares, the photo's definitely legit, the guy who took it is a Google Product Manager, i.e. definitely an employee likely to be in a position to handle the device ;)

Edit: Ugh, always late to the party.
 
It could be that Samsung is looking to take the wind out of Moto's sails and Google is trying to prove it isn't going to favor Moto. I, of course, base this on nothing but my own thoughts.

I hope this doesn't become like a love triangle. Sometime they end tragically.
 
Similar, but if we remember, vz_wired said there were four incorrect specs from BGR.
Comparing this new set of specs to BGR, we find the following differences:

1) TI OMAP4460 with dual-Cortex A9 cores clocked @ 1.5GHz (BGR claimed 1.2GHz)
2) 2MP Front facing camera (BGR claimed 1.3MP)
3) Rumored SAMOLED+ display (just because it's samsung, not actually confirmed) (BGR claimed regulard SAMOLED, not SAMOLED+)

Which would leave just one more difference. My guess would be the battery (BGR claimed 1,750mAh).

However, I'm a bit skeptical about the SAMOLED+ screen, which would then leave an additional difference...

Interesting. Either battery or the device's name....

hey! I said best guess. and then confirmed with a "no one really knows" either way still proves my point that you cant trust irc

lol
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom