1) You assume incorrect. There is a HUGE difference between accidental leaks (phone in bar), assumptions by uninformed press (Gizmodo), prototypes from a manufacturer (not considered corporate internal), photoshopped images, (also Gizmodo), and internal leaks about the latest internal plan that was never even close to being concrete (Verizon/Nexus).
2) I'm giving a pass to apple for doing what Verizon is FAILING to do. The problem I'm pointing out is that each company needs to do what it is good at. Manufacturers need to do so and services providers provide service. Service providers need to stop dictating the market for devices. If they had their way, we would never have iPhone or Android.
3) Simply put, you're not talking about the same thing that I'm discussing here. ACTUAL release dates are irrelevant to the point I'm discussing. Reminder: We're talking about how Verizon should NOT be involved in the development or release of a phone. Verizon delays a phone until they deem it appropriate for their customers. Should never happen this way. Product vs Service.
4) Not debatable. Verizon should have never had their name attached to the Bionic until it was ready for release. Moto is to blame, but when Verizon is attaches to a product they have to answer to their customer. Like it or not, this is the business/customer relationship. Regardless of this point there is still the Nexus and every other phone that has been delayed (announced release date or not) by Verizon.
Regarding the rest of your response, please don't assume that I assume anything! My rant was only aimed at Verizon given that they have a good record of taking advantage (stealing) from their customers. In addition, we're primarily talking about Verizon here given that they are first to release the Nexus in the US. I'm well aware of the crooked business practices of the other providers we have here.