• After 15+ years, we've made a big change: Android Forums is now Early Bird Club. Learn more here.

LG G3 Pre-release/Rumor/Speculation Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
I've been kinda playing the "hopeful" card until now but I'm going to take a step forward and say I think it will absolutely ship with a Snapdragon 805 and here's my reasoning...

LG intentionally moved the release forward from Q4 to most likely Q2 (June) listing market timing as the reason. If they could have included the 805 with the previous plans, why release it sooner with a lesser SoC, especially one that isn't much different than the 800 from their last flagship? That doesn't make sense to me.

There's 2 things at play here. The first is that Samsung supposedly plans to release a 2k resolution phone (purportedly the S5 Prime which it won't end up being called btw, it never is). The second, I believe, is that LG was able to get that done while also being the first to include the SoC and GPU (Adreno 420) that would best fit with that display.

Ace in the hole:

They don't have to release it on May 27. We all recognize that late May is potentially pushing it a little as it pertains to 805 availability. Even with the statement from Qualcomm about first seeing the 805 in May, LG has the option to set a firm release date even as this is typed. If it takes until mid to late June...they still win. I really don't think anyone else is far enough into a release cycle right now to beat them. I think what they've done with this approach is to buy themselves some time, perhaps up to a month, to firm up the availability of the 805 and ensure it makes it into the G3 as the final piece of the puzzle.

That's my theory and I'm sticking to it until May 27 until we know for sure. But I'm going into this thing confident. I like using Occam's Razor to play things forward and with all things considered, that scenario makes the most sense to me. They're either going to be among the last flagships released that DOESN'T include the 805 (keeping in mind they intentionally bumped up the release), or they're going to be the FIRST flagship released that includes it. Just seems so much more likely that they have a greater plan here.
 
Its showing multiple devices. You have to scroll to see the G3. Its a portal to get updates on any new devices they have. If you google "lg g3", that portal comes up as the top sponsored link and it goes direct to the G3, but you can still scroll and see the other devices as well.
 
Top 10 by post count thus far:

Steven58 (88)
iowabowtech (83)
CafeKampuchia (46)
halon (42)
hilmar2k (24)
Orion (23)
RISUG (21)
Trent Reznor (19)
Maine Coon (15)
Jeyd02 (15)


Anybody else wonder how Steven always ends up at the top of these lists? :D
 
Top 10 by post count thus far:

Steven58 (88)
iowabowtech (83)
CafeKampuchia (46)
halon (42)
hilmar2k (24)
Orion (23)
RISUG (21)
Trent Reznor (19)
Maine Coon (15)
Jeyd02 (15)


Anybody else wonder how Steven always ends up at the top of these lists? :D

That's not that big a lead:p I remember the dinc and Gnex threads:eek::vroam:
 
I hope Case-Mate makes the Tough Extreme for the G3.
I use the Tough Extreme for the S4.
I love the strictly-business design: inconspicuous legend, slim profile, non-slip polycore exterior, port covers, no raised or non-raised style-carvings, no illustrations, and a very secure fit.

I see that Case-Mate only made the Tough for the G2, if the same holds true for the G3 then I'll have to add a framed screen protector (which is the difference between the Tough and Tough Extreme).
 
I think we'll see some new stuff this week as we only have just over a week left. I'll put my money on @evleaks as he seems to have a test device (my opinion) and I think he's been chosen by LG as the internet buzz source (my further opinion).

I'm guessing we'll see either another official vid or more likely a leaked vid. But it won't show the processor or GPU info. :D
 
I've been kinda playing the "hopeful" card until now but I'm going to take a step forward and say I think it will absolutely ship with a Snapdragon 805 and here's my reasoning...

LG intentionally moved the release forward from Q4 to most likely Q2 (June) listing market timing as the reason. If they could have included the 805 with the previous plans, why release it sooner with a lesser SoC, especially one that isn't much different than the 800 from their last flagship? That doesn't make sense to me.

There's 2 things at play here. The first is that Samsung supposedly plans to release a 2k resolution phone (purportedly the S5 Prime which it won't end up being called btw, it never is). The second, I believe, is that LG was able to get that done while also being the first to include the SoC and GPU (Adreno 420) that would best fit with that display.

Ace in the hole:

They don't have to release it on May 27. We all recognize that late May is potentially pushing it a little as it pertains to 805 availability. Even with the statement from Qualcomm about first seeing the 805 in May, LG has the option to set a firm release date even as this is typed. If it takes until mid to late June...they still win. I really don't think anyone else is far enough into a release cycle right now to beat them. I think what they've done with this approach is to buy themselves some time, perhaps up to a month, to firm up the availability of the 805 and ensure it makes it into the G3 as the final piece of the puzzle.

That's my theory and I'm sticking to it until May 27 until we know for sure. But I'm going into this thing confident. I like using Occam's Razor to play things forward and with all things considered, that scenario makes the most sense to me. They're either going to be among the last flagships released that DOESN'T include the 805 (keeping in mind they intentionally bumped up the release), or they're going to be the FIRST flagship released that includes it. Just seems so much more likely that they have a greater plan here.

You getting the bigger LG plan picture. Good going...

Remember guys, LG boldly and with confident claim they will sell a lot of devices and that it'll be a big hit . those statement can be supported by great expectations for a amazing product.
 
Hello,

The LG G3 is shaping up to possibly be the best phone of 2014. With a 1440p display and a (probably) Snapdragon 805 chipset, its hardware should destroy everything else. However, one question this creates is, how, if at all, the display will affect the battery life. What do you guys think? Will this greatly damage the battery life of the phone?

Thanks,

~Chicago64
 
Hopefully the new chip will help compensate and LG seem to work some magic with battery life but, and this is a bit off topic, is that resolution really worth having in a phone?
I have pretty bad eyesight so 720p is fine for me, 1080 is excellent, is it really worth the extra horsepower needed to fire all those pixels or is that overkill and spec-waving for the sake of it?
I'm open minded tbh :thumbup:
If it wasn't for that resolution maybe the phone could afford to be thinner or stay the same size but have better battery life
 
I envy your eyes lol. I can tell the difference between 720 and 1080 but 1080 just looks perfect to me. Not sure if I'd want to pump so much more resources into getting a higher res
 
I envy your eyes lol. I can tell the difference between 720 and 1080 but 1080 just looks perfect to me. Not sure if I'd want to pump so much more resources into getting a higher res

I mean, if my HTC One (M7) could push a bit more brightness, with better battery life, it'd be perfect. I guess anything beyond this resolution is pointless.
 
I envy your eyes lol. I can tell the difference between 720 and 1080 but 1080 just looks perfect to me. Not sure if I'd want to pump so much more resources into getting a higher res

I don't think you can see any difference, not unless you're using powerful magnification AFAICT. We went beyond so called "retina displays" and being unable to see the individual pixels a while back. Can anyone tell the difference between 460dpi and 520dpi with their naked eyes?
 
It depends on the 720p. If you use the S3 as an example of 720p then I can do it, but there the subpixel structure means its real resolution is lower.

1440p sounds like a waste of power and a way of reducing performance for no purpose. The "bigger numbers" school of marketing rearing its ugly head again.
 
Do you honestly think you could tell that resolution apart from a 1080p display though with your bare eyes?
Actually, under certain circumstances I can see the pixels on my Nexus 5's 1080P display and wouldn't mind a few more.

Can anyone tell the difference between 460dpi and 520dpi with their naked eyes?
I could probably tell even at a normal holding distance, but Shovenose and I are probably the very rare exception. No sense in pumping pixels above ~450ppi on account of me. I'm content with 1080P.

1440p sounds like a waste of power and a way of reducing performance for no purpose. The "bigger numbers" school of marketing rearing its ugly head again.
The problem with this statement is that everybody said that last year when 1080P displays came out on every flagship phone, and now what's the standard? Why don't we all go back to 720P if it was truly enough and would do wonders for battery life? But your point is well taken, given the law of diminishing returns.

In any case, I don't think the higher-res display on the G3 is going to hurt it anymore than the 1080P display of the S4 hurt its battery life compared to the 720P display of the S3. LG knows what it's battery life must be like to compete in the flagship space, and there will be balancing efficiency gains besides.
 
I think it has become a numbers game. Like with so called HD audio, 192kHz sampling rates, but I can only hear up to around 15kHz I think, and I'm not a dog. ;)
 
The problem with this statement is that everybody said that last year when 1080P displays came out on every flagship phone, and now what's the standard? Why don't we all go back to 720P if it was truly enough and would do wonders for battery life? But your point is well taken, given the law of diminishing returns.
Why do people buy 16MP phones in order to upload images to FB or Instagram? ;).

As you say, it's diminishing returns. At the pixel densities we already have I'll bet that contrast, colour temperature, saturation, brightness, viewing angle all make more difference to the perceived image than differences in ppi, but those are harder to turn into a single number for marketing purposes.

If you had 2 5" displays which matched on those criteria, one 1080p and one 1440p, put them both in the same phone body and gave them to people I'd guess that almost nobody would notice there was a difference unless you asked them and the majority wouldn't be able to tell even if you did. I'm also cynical enough to suspect that if you put two identical 1080p displays in different bodies and told people that one was 1440p a significant subset of people would tell you that it was sharper (especially if they'd paid money for it).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom