Of course. But if the OS is written well, it should resist rebooting when an app is misbehaving. You can't stop everything, but the vast majority of apps should be able to crash gracefully without taking out the entire phone.
Certainly a fair question. I've got a good handle on what things will reasonably reduce reliability, and what things won't, so I wouldn't be objecting if I thought I was affecting system stability in some way.
In any event, I don't have any objection to the stability of my phone. I said the reboot irked me a bit, but I'm not calling Verizon about it or bagging on the phone because of it.
Sure. Things have come a long way, though. I don't see why currently-developed phones shouldn't be held up against the current state of computing. It's only 15ish years since Windows 3.11, but I'm not going to say, "well, it's better than things were."
Fair enough. And my last stablemen wasn't meant to say they shouldn't be held to the current standard but just an explanation as to why they don't bother me as much as they might other. (My current employer actually had a win3.11 box running as a server when I got there 8 years ago!
) However if you're hacking and loading ROMs IMO its hard to blame the OS, at least the one Google made, since its been changed. We''re probably lucky they haven't gained access to the kernel or we'd have lots more rebooting I'm sure 


