• After 15+ years, we've made a big change: Android Forums is now Early Bird Club. Learn more here.

Root [Boost Mobile] Your Rooted Warps Benchmark Scores??

Manodedios said:
Too bad they dont have a shame faced smiley icon......... i was hoping for a higher score seeing fully tweaked i got a 4716 on wcs. That being said im full at work on my tweaks.........now if only i had lil's tweakret...... :D
Click to expand...

Theres not very many tweaks in the new alienwarp to reduce issues. But you can tweak it a lot.
 
Could we get an "Out of the Box" benchmark of each ROM to show what score comes up with a fresh install only with no changes or data restored and only antutu added as far as apps go, also mentioning the sd card used or using the stock 2gb card if possible?

It's fascinating that some of us have pushed 4700+, but what's the "as packaged score" for normal every day users benchmarks we are seeing?

I am going to do this test myself on a bunch of the ROMs, but if others want to jump in I would appreciate the help, maybe we could have each ROM in the OP have the "out of the box" benchmark listed first before the "tweaked out" benchmarks.

Just a thought, I find this thread really useful and want to see how we line up as released vs tweaked doing god knows what.

Thanks ya'll!
 
Everything I have posted thus far has been "out of the box" all using the same class 4 8gb SD card. I mentioned somewhat the same thing a few pages back. The scores show much lower, roughly 300 points difference, once user data and apps have been added.
 
Mr bobo, i dont have a screenshot but i did do a benchmark stock speed before i got jiggy with it.

Alienwarp 1.03
1 ghz
No data except no frills antutu benchmark and the phandroid app

4190 score
 
Manodedios said:
Your right it was the 1.7 but down clocked to 1 ghz. The problem is unless you release 1.03 with a non oc kernel that is still out of the box
Click to expand...

Flash the rom and non-oc kernel from post 3 right after.

To me out of box is with whatever kernel it comes with.
 
Tigatron said:
Flash the rom and non-oc kernel from post 3 right after.

To me out of box is with whatever kernel it comes with.
Click to expand...


I agree with your last statement but i think what mr bobo is trying to do is get an even baseline of all the roms but i just dont see how with all the diffrent tweaks that come "stock" with the various roms. The other way we can do it is the max out the roms using the same kernel and use a uniform set of t lets say.... maybe 3 differnt govorners and i/o.??
 
I agree.
Hey mrbobo any thoughts on what we should consider "out of box"
There's so many kernels/settings that all the ROMs have out of box that its hard to figure out a starting point for what you want.
 
Out of the box is whatever is in the zip when you flash it with changing kernels or scripts etc. I meant whatever the devs put in the ROM, overclock and tweaks etc.
 
MrBobo said:
Out of the box is whatever is in the zip when you flash it with changing kernels or scripts etc. I meant whatever the devs put in the ROM, overclock and tweaks etc.
Click to expand...

Sounds good. Makes the scale weird but maybe after base scores are done dont change anything but match the CPU speed to give a good idea of how much is just the CPU oc.
 
Cyanoid 1.0
SD 32Gb Class 10
Scary/sio

screenshot-1350961282449_zps07712d4a.png



Cyanoid 1.0
SD 32Gb Class 10
smartass/sio

screenshot-1350961673689_zps7b6df0f8.png
 
I forgot to add, those scores are from a fresh install, downloaded antutu is all. And jacked the processor!!
 
Definition "out of the box" (aka OOB)
Fresh installs with a factory data reset and a reboot. No changes made other than installing antutu from the play store.

Why?
To see how our roms score in real world (read newb) application, a lot of folks aren't tweakers etc, so they use our "OOB" settings. The devs all make choices based on person preference and/or testing.

I know the initial posts were more about how the kernel does at different settings, but I wanted to see benchmarks for different roms without making changes.

OOB Scores
AlienWarp 1.03: 4304
1708

CT Mod 3.68: 3236
1024

Icon Rom 2: 3259
1024

Shinjitsu 1.5.2.4: 3488
1209

n00b ROM OC VI: 4045
1612

What it all means to me?
Not much actually, a ROM isn't all about benchmark scores, some go more for that obviously but others focus on theming, stability, etc.

It's just interesting to see the choices made and how they effect the scores... n00b VII for example will probably score lower in the next build because I am opting for a bit lower default OC, I put out a really early overclock kernel from dtm for n00b VI and want to update it so it defaults around 1.4, I think that's a stable speed to be running at.
 
Thanks mrbobo
Cool to see it layed our like that.

Myself I went for theme, stable, and scores. The best of all worlds. Lol

It would be cool to get a comparison of the ROMs at the same CPU speed. That would give us a good idea of what roms are like at a comperable CPU speed.
Maybe scale the oc ones to 1ghz so there's a baseline.
 
Hmmmm......

Seems like you have a benchmarking tweak. A quick comparison against the other top scores shows me the only improvement giving you the score was 2d performance. While the average was about 300 your pushing about 900 roughly triple.
 
Its not being faked maybe you should check the 3d scores as well rather then making false accusations. If they could be faked so easily don't you think it would have been done before now? I'm working on a way to make the mod stable kernel side because it causes glitches in other apps as well as system menus
 
shinru2004 said:
Its not being faked maybe you should check the 3d scores as well rather then making false accusations. If they could be faked so easily don't you think it would have been done before now? I'm working on a way to make the mod stable kernel side because it causes glitches in other apps as well as system menus
Click to expand...

Shin you don't have to defend yourself on this forum lol, looking forward to seeing what you are up to
 
Its like a Mob in here. Put down the pitchforks :p

Generally when scores are way above everyone else's its usually due to one of the many ramdisk tweaks developers have made to greatly increase benchmark scores without actually affecting device performance. That's what I was getting at.

I'm sorry if that originally sounded overly accusational, its hard to tell a developer or regular member making a post on tapatalk. It was a hasty response and wasn't meant to accuse, just to point out that they can and have been faked.

If you've found something to truly increase your devices performance that much, more power to you. :D
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom