Without a delivery doctor's signature, it is not the original. Yes, it is an official Hawaii certificate of live birth, but not the original birth certificate. There is a difference between the two.
Also, you may want to look at what a real 1961 Hawaii birth certificate looks like.
Is this just a parlour debate over this document?
Do you honestly believe that the intelligence and defense communities were so elated that they had a ultra liberal Democrat boss that they just wore lampshades and tossed a big cocktail party?
Do you honestly believe that they did no diligence on this?
Do you think their processes stop at signatures?
This dog-eat-dog political climate sickens me, it really does. Are we a nation of law and due process or are we simply a group of thugs bent to believe that accusation and allegation equals fact?